Velocity Reviews

Velocity Reviews (
-   Python (
-   -   Re: Can't seem to start on this (

Kene Meniru 01-03-2013 05:36 PM

Re: Can't seem to start on this
D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:

> That works too. It's just that you had users writing Python code but
> assumed that a three line subclass was beyond them. Not requiring them
> to write any Python code is a better option than the first one (global
> variables) that you proposed. That's all I am trying to say.

I understand.

>> program behaves or perhaps a building component. In that case any of
>> the other modules can be updated instead of "A". Actually "A" will
>> not be part of the packaged program.

> Or "A" becomes the script that parses the config file and runs the
> other code.

Yes. To be more precise, later I will create "A_Interface" to provide the
user with an interface for creating the contents of "A". "A_Interface" will
then parse "A", calling "B" as required to create the artifact. I had wanted
to jump into "A_Interface" using something like urwid or PyQt but it makes
sense to work with "A" directly for now.

Thanks for taking the time to understand.

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.