Re: Web Frameworks Excessive Complexity
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:08:14 -0800
Chris Rebert <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:57 AM, rh <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:12:26 -0800
> > Chris Rebert <email@example.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 9:49 AM, rh <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:41:42 +0300
> >> > Andriy Kornatskyy <email@example.com> wrote:
> >> > I'm looking at different technology right now on which to base a
> >> > site. I tried pyramid and after install it consumed 92MB of disk.
> >> > It seemed large and it turns out that it installed its own
> >> > version of python. Seems more complex to me, yet another python
> >> > on disk.
> >> That's how virtualenvs (http://www.virtualenv.org/ ) normally work.
> >> Not really Pyramid's fault, it's more a deficiency of the current
> >> Python package management tools.
> > There's still 92MB under pyramid, I just installed a new virtualenv
> > and installed wheezy.web, grand total 3.3MB.
> > What deficiency?
> "install[ing] its own version of python"
This may make it clearer.
wheezy + "myvirtualenv" = 3.3MB
pyramid = 92MB
under pyramid these are the top 5:
> -- Chris
|All times are GMT. The time now is 03:15 PM.|
Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.