Re: Passing functions as parameter (multiprocessing)
 

Oscar Benjamin wrote:

> I don't know if this is to do with the way that the code was
> simplified before posting but this subproc function wrapper does
> nothing (even after Peter fixed it below). This code is needlessly
> complicated for what it does.

Jean-Michel's Post had the following comment preceding his subproc()
definition

>>> # here it should be decorated, but for this example to be kept
>>> simple, the function is only wrapped, doing nothing special

which I unhelpfully removed...