Re: Angle of view instead of focal length
On 03/10/2012 09:19, Alfred Molon wrote:
> In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Floyd L. Davidson says...
>> I take you are unaware that there is indeed an EXIF
>> field for the field of view in degrees. At least Nikon
>> and Canon both provide that data.
>> Camera Model Name : NIKON D3S
>> Field Of View : 72.7 deg (1.96 m)
>> Focal Length : 24.0 mm (35 mm equivalent: 24.0 mm)
>> Camera Model Name : NIKON D4
>> Field Of View : 68.5 deg (2.04 m)
>> Focal Length : 24.0 mm (35 mm equivalent: 26.0 mm)
>> Camera Model Name : NIKON D800
>> Focal Length : 800.0 mm (35 mm equivalent: 800.0 mm)
>> Field Of View : 2.5 deg (2.09 m)
>> Camera Model Name : Canon EOS 60D
>> Focal Length : 50.0 mm (35 mm equivalent: 78.6 mm)
>> Field Of View : 25.8 deg
> Interesting. Which cameras support this field?
> And is there a difference between field of view and angle of view?
The EXIF Viewer here:
based on Phil Harvey's EXIF Tool shows Field Of View as a derived field
(not in the EXIF data), and it is available for my Nikon D5000 and my
iPad3, but not for my Sony HX200V.
I don't think there is any difference in the terms - both should refer
to the diagonal field of view. Perhaps modern usage is different?
|All times are GMT. The time now is 11:06 PM.|
Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.