![]() |
Javascript editor
What javascript editor is the best for writing javascript???
|
Re: Javascript editor
Renato Cindori wrote:
> What javascript editor is the best for writing javascript??? 1. It's _JavaScript_, and that is only one ECMAScript implementation. <URL:http://pointedears.de/scripts/js-version-info#ecmascript> (Probably I will add KJS later.) 2. Google is your friend. [psf 6.1] I would like to add that MyEclipse 4.1M2 [1] (which alas is not compatible to Eclipse 3.2M4 which introduces linked resources everywhere among other nice things[2]; however, it is to 3.2M3 [3]) has its JavaScript editor improved and a JavaScript debugger added (where I have not tested the latter yet): <URL:http://myeclipseide.com/ContentExpress-display-ceid-70.html> PointedEars P.S.: Your keyboard seems to be broken, especially Question Mark key. ___________ [1] <URL:http://myeclipseide.com/Downloads%2Bindex-req-viewdownload-cid-4.html> [2] <URL:http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/S-3.2M4-200512151506/> [3] <URL:http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/S-3.2M3-200511021600/> |
Re: Javascript editor
> What javascript editor is the best for writing javascript???
> I like Eclipse with JS Eclipse http://www.interaktonline.com/Produc...ipse/Overview/ but you can not really say that any editor is the best zwetan |
Re: Javascript editor
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> I would like to add that MyEclipse 4.1M2 [1] (which alas is not compatible > to Eclipse 3.2M4 which introduces linked resources everywhere among other > nice things[2]; however, it is to 3.2M3 [3]) has its JavaScript editor > improved and a JavaScript debugger added (where I have not tested the > latter yet): > > <URL:http://myeclipseide.com/ContentExpress-display-ceid-70.html> I have now, alas it turns out that "The JavaScript debugger cannot be used in non-Windows OS in this version of MyEclipse", which is a Big Minus for me. One would have thought they would include means to use an external debugger of choice. But then again the Code Assist feature specifies DOM features like document.getElementById that NN4(!) does not support as "not supported by Netscape" and "only supported by IE" ... PointedEars |
Re: Javascript editor
Thanks
"Renato Cindori" <rcindori@varteks.com> wrote in message news:dorjpk$937$1@ss405.t-com.hr... > What javascript editor is the best for writing javascript??? > > > > |
Re: Javascript editor
> What javascript editor is the best for writing javascript???
The Zeus for Windows IDE has support for Java Script: http://www.zeusedit.com/features.html Note: Zeus is shareware (45 day trial) It does code folding, class browsing and syntax highlighting for the Java Script language. You can even write Zeus macros using Java Script. Jussi Jumppanen Author: Zeus for Windows |
Re: Javascript editor
On 27/12/2005 15:07, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
[snip] > <URL:http://pointedears.de/scripts/js-version-info#ecmascript> There appear to be some inaccuracies and omissions in the Language Features table. The following features work here in IE 4.01, which would put the JScript version at 3.0 (at least). - UnicodeEscapeSequence in string and regular expression literals. - The arguments.callee property. - The String.prototype.charCodeAt method. The following features work here in NN 4.08, which would put the JavaScript version at 1.3 (at least). - The arguments object (as a local variable). - FunctionExpression (anonymous). Missing features and other incorrect versions. - The Array.prototype.unshift method is not listed. It is a JavaScript 1.2/JScript 5.5 feature. - The Array.prototype.splice method is listed as a JavaScript 1.2 feature, though it wasn't correctly implemented until 1.3 (it didn't previously return an array containing removed elements). It is also listed as a JScript 2.0 feature, though it wasn't introduced until 5.5. There might be other things that I didn't notice. [snip] Mike -- Michael Winter Prefix subject with [News] before replying by e-mail. |
Re: Javascript editor
Michael Winter wrote:
> On 27/12/2005 15:07, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> <URL:http://pointedears.de/scripts/js-version-info#ecmascript> > > There appear to be some inaccuracies and omissions in the Language > Features table. [...] Thanks. This document is based on what I could find in vendor's online documentations and on certain occasions where I could test the respective feature; it does not claim to be accurate or complete (should I add that provision to the text?) Any correction/addition as to things really are is welcome and will be credited where it is due. Regards, PointedEars |
Re: Javascript editor
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn said the following on 12/30/2005 11:12 AM:
> Michael Winter wrote: > > >>On 27/12/2005 15:07, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> >>> <URL:http://pointedears.de/scripts/js-version-info#ecmascript> >> >>There appear to be some inaccuracies and omissions in the Language >>Features table. [...] > > > Thanks. This document is based on what I could find in vendor's online > documentations and on certain occasions where I could test the respective > feature; it does not claim to be accurate or complete (should I add that > provision to the text?) Yes. And possibly a contact method so that people who see it and possible inaccuracies could let you know. > Any correction/addition as to things really are is welcome and will be > credited where it is due. Line: 124 Char: 1 Error: Object doesn't support this method or property. Is the error given when the page opens. IE6 SP2 on WinXP -- Randy comp.lang.javascript FAQ - http://jibbering.com/faq & newsgroup weekly Javascript Best Practices - http://www.JavascriptToolbox.com/bestpractices/ |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 04:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.