![]() |
"break" from a block and a proc object used in block position
Hi!
In german ruby-forum we had a question which ends up in unclear situations. The following code: ----- Code ----- def useblk1 puts "block (useblk1) returns '#{yield}'" 99 end puts "useblk1 returns '#{useblk1 {break 42}}'" def useblk2(&blk) puts "block (useblk2) returns '#{blk.call}'" 99 end puts "useblk2 returns '#{useblk2 {break 42}}'" def useblk3 puts "block (useblk3) returns '#{yield}'" 99 end puts "useblk3 returns '#{useblk3(&lambda{break 42})}'" rescue puts "useblk3 error: #$!" def useblk4 puts "block (useblk4) returns '#{yield}'" 99 end puts "useblk4 returns '#{useblk4(&Proc.new{break 42})}'" rescue puts "useblk4 error: #$!" ----- End of Code ----- results under Ruby 1.8.6 (OneClickInstaller-186-25) in: ----- Result Ruby 1.8.6 ----- useblk1 returns '42' useblk2 returns '42' useblk3 error: break from proc-closure useblk4 error: break from proc-closure ----- End of Result ----- Which surprises me. When I read "PickAxe2" all should return from the method with the value presented by "break". When I run this Program with Ruby 1.9 (MSYS/MinGW build on Windows2000, 2007-05-15 patchlevel 0) the result is the following: ----- Result Ruby 1.9 ----- useblk1 returns '42' block (useblk2) returns '42' useblk2 returns '99' useblk3 returns '42' useblk4 returns '42' ----- End of Result ----- Here I'm confused by the result of "useblk2", but the rest is clear for me. Did I make an error? - Are there Errors in 1.8.6? - Are there Errors in 1.9? - ??? I must admit that I am confused... Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 01:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.