I'm happy with Python 2.5
 

Python 2.5 (r25:51908, Sep 19 2006, 09:52:17) [MSC v.1310 32 bit
(Intel)] on win32

and Idon't move neither up nor down from it (the best & the fastest
version)

Re: I'm happy with Python 2.5
 

Python 3 is a tempor. lapse of reason.
Just my an intuitive sensation, nothing objective in it.

Re: I'm happy with Python 2.5
 

On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 05:34:44 -0800, n00m wrote:

> Python 2.5 (r25:51908, Sep 19 2006, 09:52:17) [MSC v.1310 32 bit
> (Intel)] on win32
>
> and Idon't move neither up nor down from it (the best & the fastest
> version)

Congratulations.


--
Steven

Re: I'm happy with Python 2.5
 

Steve, see a list of accepted langs there, in bottom dropdown:
http://www.spoj.pl/submit/ There *was* Python 2.6.
Then admins shifted back to 2.5. People vote by their legs.

Re: I'm happy with Python 2.5
 

what the hell does that have to do with anything

On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 5:34 PM, n00m <n00m@narod.ru> wrote:
> Python 2.5 (r25:51908, Sep 19 2006, 09:52:17) [MSC v.1310 32 bit
> (Intel)] on win32
>
> and Idon't move neither up nor down from it (the best & the fastest
> version)
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>

Re: I'm happy with Python 2.5
 

On Feb 27, 3:58*pm, Grigory Javadyan <grigory.javad...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> what the hell does that have to do with anything
>
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 5:34 PM, n00m <n...@narod.ru> wrote:
> > Python 2.5 (r25:51908, Sep 19 2006, 09:52:17) [MSC v.1310 32 bit
> > (Intel)] on win32
>
> > and Idon't move neither up nor down from it (the best & the fastest
> > version)
> > --
> >http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
>

Am I turmoiling your wishful thinking?
You may nourish it till the end of time.

Re: I'm happy with Python 2.5
 

http://www.spoj.pl/problems/TMUL/

Python's "print a * b" gets Time Limit Exceeded.

=============================================
PHP's code
=============================================
fscanf(STDIN, "%d\n", &$tcs);
while ($tcs--) {
fscanf(STDIN, "%s %s\n", &$n, &$m);
echo bcmul($n, $m, 0)."\n";
}
=============================================
does it in 4.8s

Re: I'm happy with Python 2.5
 

n00m wrote:
> Am I turmoiling your wishful thinking?
> You may nourish it till the end of time.

Let us cease to nourish those fabled ones who dwell under bridges.

--
Tom Zych / freethinker@pobox.com
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.

Re: I'm happy with Python 2.5
 

On 02/27/2011 09:27 AM, Tom Zych wrote:
> n00m wrote:
>> Am I turmoiling your wishful thinking?
>> You may nourish it till the end of time.
>
> Let us cease to nourish those fabled ones who dwell under bridges.
>

LOL !

Re: I'm happy with Python 2.5
 

On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 7:15 AM, n00m <n00m@narod.ru> wrote:
> http://www.spoj.pl/problems/TMUL/
>
> Python's "print a * b" gets Time Limit Exceeded.

If speed is the only thing you care about, then you can forget about
fretting over whether 2.5 or 3.1 is faster. You're using the wrong
language to begin with.