![]() |
Anyone else noticed a change in this group?
Anyone else noticed a change in this group ten days ago - since about
7th February? James |
Re: Anyone else noticed a change in this group?
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:55:01 -0800 (PST), James Harris wrote:
>Anyone else noticed a change in this group ten days ago - since about >7th February? Not I. I noticed a big change a few months ago when the scum vendor of designer knockoffs started spamming it. Since then, I've switched to eternal-september as my news server and I just don't see the spam, although I very occasionally lose real posts thanks to their rather aggressive filtering. However, the presence of the lowlife spammer does appear to have discouraged real users; the volume of genuine traffic seems to have fallen by at least a factor of 2 over that time. No real measurement, just gut feel - sorry. -- Jonathan Bromley |
Re: Anyone else noticed a change in this group?
On Feb 17, 9:30*am, Jonathan Bromley <jonathan.brom...@MYCOMPANY.com>
wrote: > On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:55:01 -0800 (PST), James Harris wrote: > >Anyone else noticed a change in this group ten days ago - since about > >7th February? > > Not I. > > I noticed a big change a few months ago when the scum vendor of > designer knockoffs started spamming it. *Since then, I've switched > to eternal-september as my news server and I just don't see the > spam, although I very occasionally lose real posts thanks to their > rather aggressive filtering. > > However, the presence of the lowlife spammer does appear to have > discouraged real users; the volume of genuine traffic seems to > have fallen by at least a factor of 2 over that time. *No > real measurement, just gut feel - sorry. > -- > Jonathan Bromley For a while, the spam reporting tools seemed to be working on google groups, and the spam was knocked down. But for the last few months, until about Feb 7th, at least the reporting for c.l.vhdl was not working or was being ignored. I kept reporting for a while, but after a week or two with no results, I gave up. Glad to see they are getting control of it. Here's hoping the legitimate traffic picks back up. (it already seems to have, at least a little) Andy |
Re: Anyone else noticed a change in this group?
On 17 Feb, 15:44, Andy <jonesa...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Feb 17, 9:30*am, Jonathan Bromley <jonathan.brom...@MYCOMPANY.com> .... > For a while, the spam reporting tools seemed to be working on google > groups, and the spam was knocked down. But for the last few months, > until about Feb 7th, at least the reporting for c.l.vhdl was not > working or was being ignored. I kept reporting for a while, but after > a week or two with no results, I gave up. Glad to see they are getting > control of it. Right. The spam which was flooding this group seems so far to have ceased altogether. I know some reputable Usenet providers filtered it anyway but it always showed up on Google (where at least some of it appeared to come from). Now, for some reason, it has abruptly stopped which is most welcome. I don't know what's changed and I've only seen the effect on this newsgroup so far but hopefully whatever is working continues to work. James |
Re: Anyone else noticed a change in this group?
On 02/18/2010 08:41 AM, James Harris wrote:
> > Right. The spam which was flooding this group seems so far to have > ceased altogether. I know some reputable Usenet providers filtered it > anyway but it always showed up on Google (where at least some of it > appeared to come from). Now, for some reason, it has abruptly stopped > which is most welcome. For all of january I sent a daily e-mail to the google abuse team reporting spam articles. Crosses fingers hope it stays like this. Andy > > I don't know what's changed and I've only seen the effect on this > newsgroup so far but hopefully whatever is working continues to work. > > James |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 12:09 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.