![]() |
Split class across multiple files
I have a class which holds a connection to a server and a bunch of
services. In this class I have methods that need to work with that connection and services. Right now there are about 50 methods some of which can be quite long. From an organizational standpoint, I'd like to have method implementations in their own files. Is this possible? It is recommended? Should I just stop worrying about it and have a 5,000 line class? |
Re: Split class across multiple files
eric.frederich schrieb:
> I have a class which holds a connection to a server and a bunch of > services. > In this class I have methods that need to work with that connection > and services. > > Right now there are about 50 methods some of which can be quite long. > From an organizational standpoint, I'd like to have method > implementations in their own files. > > Is this possible? It is recommended? Should I just stop worrying > about it and have a 5,000 line class? It is pretty easy to do, as python allows multiple inheritance. Just group together methods into a class, and create one that inherits from all. However, I'd say something that even splitted up is essentially one class with 5000 lines cries for a huge refactoring. Of course this depends on the use-case, but I for once don't have a single such beast. Looks like a god-object to me... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_object Diez |
Re: Split class across multiple files
On Nov 20, 8:14*am, "eric.frederich" <eric.freder...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have a class which holds a connection to a server and a bunch of > services. > In this class I have methods that need to work with that connection > and services. > > Right now there are about 50 methods some of which can be quite long. > From an organizational standpoint, I'd like to have method > implementations in their own files. > > Is this possible? Yes, define all your different methods in separate classes in separate files. Then subclasses all of those separate classes into one big class. > It is recommended? Debateable. Personally, I have no problem using inheritance for purely mechanical reasons. Others might. (In my case, it was a separation into general and customized behavior. I wanted to define generic behavior in one package, and specialized behavior in another, but there was no internal logical difference between specialized and generic methods.) However.... > Should I just stop worrying > about it and have a 5,000 line class? Five thousand lines is pushing the comfort level of how big a class ought to be. I suggest instead of worrying about how to mechanically split off methods into different files, you should consider whether there's a way to refactor that one big class into smaller ones. Then the problem you have goes away. Carl Banks |
Re: Split class across multiple files
Yeah... it does seem like a God Object.
My reasoning for putting them all into one big class is that the class has references to all the required resources, connections, and services. The other option would be to have a simple object called Session which did nothing but login and hold those references. The problem then is that I'd have 50 methods all of which would need to take that session object as an argument. That is what I was trying to avoid, having a ton of methods all taking the same first parameter. In most cases there would only be one session. Perhaps I could do a singleton approach and have each of these methods implicitly use the single session object unless called with a session= keyword argument. How does this look?..... # Begin Session.py class Session(): def __init__(self, host=None, username=None, password=None): if host and username and password: self.login(host, username, password) def login(self, host, username, password): self.host = host self.username = username self.password = password self.connection = Something.login(host, username, password) self.someService = SomeService.getService(connection) self.anotherService = AnotherService.getService(connection) def logout(self): return self.connection.logout() defaultSession = Session() # Begin MyLibrary.py from session import defaultSession def doSomethig(x, y, z, session=defaultSession): return session.someService.doSomething(x, y, z) def anotherFunction(x, y, session=defaultSession): ret = 0 for item in session.anotherService.getStuff(x): if session.someService.foo(item, y): session.anotherService.bar(item, x) ret += 1 return ret On Nov 20, 11:31*am, "Diez B. Roggisch" <de...@nospam.web.de> wrote: > eric.frederich schrieb: > > > I have a class which holds a connection to a server and a bunch of > > services. > > In this class I have methods that need to work with that connection > > and services. > > > Right now there are about 50 methods some of which can be quite long. > > From an organizational standpoint, I'd like to have method > > implementations in their own files. > > > Is this possible? *It is recommended? *Should I just stop worrying > > about it and have a 5,000 line class? > > It is pretty easy to do, as python allows multiple inheritance. Just > group together methods into a class, and create one that inherits from all. > > However, I'd say something that even splitted up is essentially one > class with 5000 lines cries for a huge refactoring. Of course this > depends on the use-case, but I for once don't have a single such beast. > Looks like a god-object to me... > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_object > > Diez |
Re: Split class across multiple files
eric.frederich wrote:
> I have a class which holds a connection to a server and a bunch of > services. > In this class I have methods that need to work with that connection > and services. > > Right now there are about 50 methods some of which can be quite long. >>From an organizational standpoint, I'd like to have method > implementations in their own files. > > Is this possible? A method is just function that is a class attribute. from somemethod import somemethod # has def somemethod class Huge: somemethod = somemethod # or class Huge: defs ... Huge.somemethod = somemethod > It is recommended? Should I just stop worrying > about it and have a 5,000 line class? I suspect some refactoring would be useful. |
Re: Split class across multiple files
eric.frederich wrote:
> I have a class which holds a connection to a server and a bunch of > services. > In this class I have methods that need to work with that connection > and services. > > Right now there are about 50 methods some of which can be quite long. > From an organizational standpoint, I'd like to have method > implementations in their own files. > > Is this possible? It is recommended? Should I just stop worrying > about it and have a 5,000 line class? If you're not joking about the 5000 lines estimation, then with 50 methods, each method would be ~100 lines? That stinks of huge refactoring. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 03:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.