Velocity Reviews

Velocity Reviews (http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/index.php)
-   ASP .Net (http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/f29-asp-net.html)
-   -   Web Form Performance Versus Single File Performance (http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/t68739-web-form-performance-versus-single-file-performance.html)

jm 12-12-2003 10:28 PM

Web Form Performance Versus Single File Performance
 
Those of you who use Visual Studio, do you find a big performance
difference between the single file model and the web form / class
behind form model? I am trying to justify purchasing Visual Studio
..NET and want the "extended features" (compiling the .net page) to be
one of the reasons.

Thanks for any links, guidance, and help.

alien2_51 12-12-2003 11:14 PM

Re: Web Form Performance Versus Single File Performance
 
There's definate benefits of using the code behind model, especially with
larger projects with a lot of code. There's clear seperation between client
code and server code... I'm not sure but I think you should be able to use
the code behind model with web matrix, although the VS.NET debugger is
priceless and every bit worth buyong the full blown IDE...

http://www.asp.net/webmatrix/


"jm" <john_20_28_2000@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c67e4bdd.0312121428.7a7dcea7@posting.google.c om...
> Those of you who use Visual Studio, do you find a big performance
> difference between the single file model and the web form / class
> behind form model? I am trying to justify purchasing Visual Studio
> .NET and want the "extended features" (compiling the .net page) to be
> one of the reasons.
>
> Thanks for any links, guidance, and help.





All times are GMT. The time now is 09:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57