||04-25-2009 12:13 PM
constants as of array of integers, for loops
I have been searching around :captain: for more than a day intensively but I was unable to find any answer. I am having a problem with constants substitution in VHDL and I have no idea why.
I have a package where I defined a constant as an array of integers with the index from ( 0 downto 0)
. The constant I am talking about is g_nr_of_ahb_masters
and is the last one in the post below.
package utel_crc_ccu_config_pkg is
constant g_nr_of_base_clks : integer := 1;
subtype ccu_base_clk_cfg_cell_type is array_of_integer_type(g_nr_of_base_clks-1 downto 0);
type ccu_base_clk_cfg_array_type is array (integer range <>) of ccu_base_clk_cfg_cell_type;
constant g_base_clk_cfg_array : ccu_base_clk_cfg_array_type (0 to 2) := ( (0 => 3) , (0 => 0) , (0 => 0) );
constant g_nr_of_ahb_masters : ccu_base_clk_cfg_cell_type := g_base_clk_cfg_array(2);
As can be seen g_nr_of_ahb_masters(0) is equal with 0
The tricky part is that I am using this constant in a process statement where for loops are defined as shown below
mux_proc : process (ahb_master_auto_int, branch_clk_int, hclken_int, gated_clk_override_int)
for i in 0 to g_nr_of_base_clks-1 loop
if (g_nr_of_ahb_masters(i) > 0) then
-- it goes here WHY?????? since g_nr_of_ahb_masters(0) is 0, isn't it
end process mux_proc;
When parsing this code it tries to go inside the "if" statement but it should avoid it.
If I replace g_nr_of_ahb_masters(i) with g_nr_of_ahb_masters(0) it does not go inside the "if" anymore.
What am I doing wrong
Thank you in advance for any answers,
|All times are GMT. The time now is 08:42 AM.
Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.