![]() |
Any one else using this book?
"MCAD/MCSD Visual Basic .NET Certification" by Chambers, Fowler, Linde
and Sequiera, from Osborne. Part of the "All-in-one" series, covers 305, 306, 310. Been using this the last few weeks and curious about other's opinions on its overall worth. It seemed a good value, covering all three tests. My aim in pursuing certs is not just to get the certs, but to get some experience with the .NET technology in a structured way, since I don't have a job that uses it. It seems a good, if somewhat perfunctory, intro to VB.NET and ASP.NET... can't say for sure about the XML and web services etc. I've been concentrating on desktop to begin with... have read all the rest, but don't know enough about the subjects to know if they're being covered adequately. The included MasterExam practice tests seem of dubious value. Only 56 available questions for 306 says to me that you're going to get every question, every time you do it. I see no value in memorizing answers to practice questions, and if every time you get the same questions, you're going to end up memorizing them whether you want to or not. Also, according to the 306 practice exam, I'm ready. But surely don't feel like I have sufficiently worthwhile knowledge of the material to warrant that. Unlike when I was doing VB6 certs a few years ago. Suggesting that the MasterExam, at least, is simple-minded. Is that true of the entire book? rabbit |
Re: Any one else using this book?
I have not used the book you're using, but I definitely used Mike's books for my test prep. So, from my experience and from the posts of others, I can definitely say Mike's books are far better than anything out there. Of course, using a single book for all 3 test prep would definitely result in cost savings but if you really want to go beyond test prep, I would advise you to take a look at Mike's books. The Amazon links for Mike's books are 70-305 : http://tinyurl.com/56cmr 70-306 : http://tinyurl.com/5hapf 70-310 : http://tinyurl.com/52oav Errata : http://www.larkware.com/TGErrata.txt - Raja. >-----Original Message----- >"MCAD/MCSD Visual Basic .NET Certification" by Chambers, Fowler, Linde >and Sequiera, from Osborne. Part of the "All-in-one" series, covers >305, 306, 310. Been using this the last few weeks and curious about >other's opinions on its overall worth. It seemed a good value, covering >all three tests. My aim in pursuing certs is not just to get the certs, >but to get some experience with the .NET technology in a structured way, >since I don't have a job that uses it. It seems a good, if somewhat >perfunctory, intro to VB.NET and ASP.NET... can't say for sure about the >XML and web services etc. I've been concentrating on desktop to begin >with... have read all the rest, but don't know enough about the subjects >to know if they're being covered adequately. The included MasterExam >practice tests seem of dubious value. Only 56 available questions for >306 says to me that you're going to get every question, every time you >do it. I see no value in memorizing answers to practice questions, and >if every time you get the same questions, you're going to end up >memorizing them whether you want to or not. Also, according to the 306 >practice exam, I'm ready. But surely don't feel like I have >sufficiently worthwhile knowledge of the material to warrant that. >Unlike when I was doing VB6 certs a few years ago. Suggesting that the >MasterExam, at least, is simple-minded. Is that true of the entire book? > >rabbit >. > |
Re: Any one else using this book?
Yea, I think you're right. I've gone ahead and ordered 305 and 306.
Will hold off on 310 for the moment (I am unemployed, after all <g>). Thanks for the input. rabbit Raja wrote: > Of course, using a single book for all 3 test prep would > definitely result in cost savings but if you really want > to go beyond test prep, I would advise you to take a look > at Mike's books. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 12:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.