![]() |
Re: Libz oppose Cultural Commissars
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 23:13:23 -0700, mikegordge wrote:
> > Shane wrote: >> you made the assertion... > > No ewe admitted it, you cant stop computers being hacked without first > knowing how to hack them. You lied about being an advocate of trade, so > how on earth can you be trusted to be telling the truth in regards to > not being a computer hacker. > >> now my mothers worried.. we cant have hackers in >> the family.. it just wouldnt be the done thing you know > > Best you cut your throat then, that'd be one less worry for mum and > another dead parasite, just what this country needs. > > Back to the subject now Frog, how can a contradiction be a validation? > > > Michael Gordge link to an admission... go to www.google.com click the groups link, then the advanced link and fill in the appropriate values _If_ you find anywhere on the planet where I call myself a hacker, where I claim to be a computer criminal, or anything that remotely _looks_ like me being a ahcker please show me.. and the three NG's I have posted this to IDIOT -- Hardware, n.: The parts of a computer system that can be kicked |
Re: Libz oppose Cultural Commissars
Shane wrote: > link to an admission... **** off you cant be trusted Frog, you claimed to be an advocate of trade and then demanded that people be forced to pay for your computer hacking trips to Auckland. You are a liar and a cheat Frog, sheeeesh what a collection, the evidence is over-whelming, eg you're also a socialist all socialists are liars Frog, ewe cant be a socialist and not a liar Frog, but not all liars are socialists of course. Ewe have to learn how to lie to be a socialist, you're a perfect liar and therefore a perfect socialist. Michael Gordge |
Re: Libz oppose Cultural Commissars
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 23:25:50 -0700, mikegordge wrote:
> > Shane wrote: >> link to an admission... > > **** off you cant be trusted Frog, you claimed to be an advocate of > trade and then demanded that people be forced to pay for your computer > hacking trips to Auckland. if I made these claims then google will have them archived for 20 years for your perusal.. link to them (assuming they exist) > > You are a liar and a cheat Frog, sheeeesh what a collection, the > evidence is over-whelming, eg you're also a socialist all socialists are > liars Frog, ewe cant be a socialist and not a liar Frog, but not all > liars are socialists of course. > hmm heres another accusation.. no chance you can find proof of me ever claiming to be a socialist? > Ewe have to learn how to lie to be a socialist, you're a perfect liar > and therefore a perfect socialist. > > > Michael Gordge I wont be holding my breath on you coming up with evidence... let alone proof -- Hardware, n.: The parts of a computer system that can be kicked |
Re: Libz oppose Cultural Commissars
Pooh... stinky!
Someone left the cesspit door open.... -- Cheers Anton |
Re: Libz oppose Cultural Commissars
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:50:49 +1200, AD. wrote:
> Pooh... stinky! > > Someone left the cesspit door open.... lol sorry.. felt it was mildly relevant in that he claims anyone with knowledge of security with regards to computers is a hacker (in the computer criminal sense) /me ceases and desists -- Hardware, n.: The parts of a computer system that can be kicked |
Re: Libz oppose Cultural Commissars
Shane wrote: Stop running away from the subject hacker and answer the ****en question, how can a contradiction validate anything? Michael Gordge |
Re: Libz oppose Cultural Commissars
Shane wrote: > hmm heres another accusation.. I've been saying that about ewe for yonks and its not an accusation if its true. Unless of course ewe are not Shane akafrog or whatever it calls itself. > no chance you can find proof of me ever > claiming to be a socialist? Any ****wit who claims tax is not theft IS a socialist. Michael Gordge |
Re: Libz oppose Cultural Commissars
Shane wrote: > and the three NG's I have posted this to.. Oh come on froggy what the **** is going on, why not keep this thread alive, seen as ewe wanted all the world to see that you can hack into their ****en computers. Come on froogy I'm still waiting for ewe to explain how your contradictions can be a validation of anything. You claimed ewe had validated your socialist philosophy (aside from the fact that is simply not possible so dont feel too bad) however what you presented as validation was in fact, was in reality, a contradiction of YOUR claim that YOU agree with the concept of trade. You agreed that *trade* was defined as, two or more peaceful individuals, through voluntary association or interaction, agreeing to exchange their goods and or services with the *intent* of both obtaining a greater for a lessor value* You then said people ought be forced, whether they wanted to or not, to pay for your computer hacking trips to Auckland, even if it meant they had no choice but to end up with a lessor for a greater value, in two word *sacrifice themselves* for ****en YOU. What a khunt, what a parasite. FFS Froggy you have the ****en audacity to demand JB prove reality, and here is your golden chance to prove what you believe is based upon objective reality and yet you run away screaming to your bloody mummy. Ewe gutless ****en moronic whimp and liar and you remain a gutless ****en moronic whimp and liar until ewe explain what the **** you are on about *rationally* - *logically* GOT THAT? Michael Gordge |
Re: Libz oppose Cultural Commissars
In article <14s2k2-8s7.ln1@news.vuw.ac.nz>, thing <thing@nowahre.com> wrote:
>mikegordge@xtra.co.nz wrote: >> Shane wrote: >>>hmm heres another accusation.. >> I've been saying that about ewe for yonks and its not an accusation if >> its true. >> Unless of course ewe are not Shane akafrog or whatever it calls itself. >>>no chance you can find proof of me ever >>>claiming to be a socialist? >> Any ****wit who claims tax is not theft IS a socialist. >> Michael Gordge >Only in your twisted mind. > >If there is no tax then we have no government so its anarchy......I dont >want to live in anarchy. I do ... but it is exactly people like gorge who make the ideal imposible :) >If we did, we would have to each pay for security guards instead of >police, which is a tax by another name. No ... no one would do anything so stupid as to be (currently) illegal ... everyone behaves sanely and reasonably ... and there is your practical problem. :) Anarchy is great in theory ... but not useful (sadly) in practice - too many of the sadly non terminally stupid :) .. Bruce ------------------------------------- The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it. - George Bernard Shaw Cynic, n: a blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they ought to be. - Ambrose Bierce Caution ===== followups may have been changed to relevant groups (if there were any) |
Re: Libz oppose Cultural Commissars
mikegordge@xtra.co.nz wrote:
> Shane wrote: > >>hmm heres another accusation.. > > > I've been saying that about ewe for yonks and its not an accusation if > its true. > > Unless of course ewe are not Shane akafrog or whatever it calls itself. > > >>no chance you can find proof of me ever >>claiming to be a socialist? > > > Any ****wit who claims tax is not theft IS a socialist. > > > Michael Gordge > Only in your twisted mind. If there is no tax then we have no government so its anarchy......I dont want to live in anarchy. If we did, we would have to each pay for security guards instead of police, which is a tax by another name. See you at the election, lets see if your party even polls. regards Thing |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 03:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.