Velocity Reviews

Velocity Reviews (http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/index.php)
-   NZ Computing (http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/f47-nz-computing.html)
-   -   digital camera recommendation (http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/t566891-digital-camera-recommendation.html)

will 08-06-2003 07:07 AM

digital camera recommendation
 
i'm looking at buying a digital camera at the moment, images taken will
mostly be internet use, and maybe some 4x6 prints occasionally, what's
the minimum pixel requirement for such usage?

will.

Robert Mathews 08-06-2003 07:45 AM

Re: digital camera recommendation
 
On Wed, 06 Aug 2003 19:07:49 +1200, will <wsiau@veryhotmail.com> wrote:

>i'm looking at buying a digital camera at the moment, images taken will
>mostly be internet use, and maybe some 4x6 prints occasionally, what's
>the minimum pixel requirement for such usage?
>
>will.



2 - 3 mpx camera, and with optical zoom.

At least $600 and up.



Max 08-06-2003 11:06 AM

Re: digital camera recommendation
 
On Wed, 06 Aug 2003 19:07:49 +1200, will <wsiau@veryhotmail.com>
wrote:

>i'm looking at buying a digital camera at the moment, images taken will
>mostly be internet use, and maybe some 4x6 prints occasionally, what's
>the minimum pixel requirement for such usage?
>
>will.


The higher the MP rating the better. I have heard that about 8MP will
be equivalent in res to a normal photo. I saw a 3 MP HP camera +
printer fror about $600 at Noel Lemmings I think, which looked good
value.

Robert Mathews 08-06-2003 11:42 AM

Re: digital camera recommendation
 
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 23:40:02 +1200, Mainlander <*@*.*> wrote:

>In article <3F30A945.90A55FC5@veryhotmail.com>, wsiau@veryhotmail.com
>says...
>> i'm looking at buying a digital camera at the moment, images taken will
>> mostly be internet use, and maybe some 4x6 prints occasionally, what's
>> the minimum pixel requirement for such usage?

>
>640 x 480 is half a megapixel, a fairly cheap camera would do this, even
>one of those old Sony floppy disk cameras.



And no good for post card prints



Robert Mathews 08-06-2003 09:33 PM

Re: digital camera recommendation
 
will wrote:
> i'm looking at buying a digital camera at the moment, images taken
> will mostly be internet use, and maybe some 4x6 prints occasionally,
> what's the minimum pixel requirement for such usage?


Will, Frogprints have a nice chart explaing different res vs print quality.

http://www.frogprints.co.nz/help/quality.cfm

You can go with el cheapo cameras, particularly if most of the shots are for
the www. I sill use an on 1.2MP camera which does the job fantastically.
Perhaps even a secondhand one ??

Good luck mate.



V 08-06-2003 10:43 PM

Re: digital camera recommendation
 
2 mega-pix would be more than enought for what you will be doing. As
for optical zoom, it depends if you REALLY NEED the optical zoom. With
almost $200 price premium for optical zoom model over the non-optical
zoom counter parts, is it really worth that much? I don't think it
worth $200 for some people that only want a basic camera for internet
use.



On Wed, 06 Aug 2003 19:07:49 +1200, will <wsiau@veryhotmail.com>
wrote:

>i'm looking at buying a digital camera at the moment, images taken will
>mostly be internet use, and maybe some 4x6 prints occasionally, what's
>the minimum pixel requirement for such usage?
>
>will.


Robert Mathews 08-06-2003 11:57 PM

Re: digital camera recommendation
 
On Thu, 07 Aug 2003 10:43:21 +1200, V <vincenth@ihug.co.nz> wrote:

>2 mega-pix would be more than enought for what you will be doing. As
>for optical zoom, it depends if you REALLY NEED the optical zoom. With
>almost $200 price premium for optical zoom model over the non-optical
>zoom counter parts, is it really worth that much? I don't think it
>worth $200 for some people that only want a basic camera for internet
>use.
>
>





Please read what he stated "and maybe some 4x6 prints occasionally"
a bit more than a Web camera don't you think.


>On Wed, 06 Aug 2003 19:07:49 +1200, will <wsiau@veryhotmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>i'm looking at buying a digital camera at the moment, images taken will
>>mostly be internet use, and maybe some 4x6 prints occasionally, what's
>>the minimum pixel requirement for such usage?
>>
>>will.



Chris Mayhew 08-07-2003 12:03 AM

Re: digital camera recommendation
 
will <wsiau@veryhotmail.com> wrote in
news:3F30A945.90A55FC5@veryhotmail.com:

> i'm looking at buying a digital camera at the moment, images taken will
> mostly be internet use, and maybe some 4x6 prints occasionally, what's
> the minimum pixel requirement for such usage?
>
> will.


I have been looking at 4 models for just the same thing and came up with
the following summary but haven't decided what one to buy. None of them
have Optical Zoom. At 2 MP Digital zoom is more marketing hype than
anything else. They are all 2 or 2.1 MP. This is just a summary of the
notes I made about things that interested me not a detailed summary of the
camera's themselves

Samsung Digimax 201 http://www.samsungcamera.com/
Ascent $325.71 GST Incl, uses MMC or SD cards. Can be used as a card
reader so you can transfer files between PC's - the camera appears as a
removable drive. Comes with a carry case but doesn't appear to have a
built in lens cover. You can down load the manual as PDF.

Olympus Camedia C150
Ascent $347.76 GST Incl, uses xD cards which tend to be a lot dearer than
MMC or SD. Has a cover that slides across lens. Can connect to TV to view
photo's

Kodak CX4200
Warehouse Stationery has a special on at $269.99 GST Incl. Pic's look fine
printed at about 6x4 on photo paper. Camera looks a little cheap. Has
built in lens cover.

Microtek Take it D1
Ascent $283.49 GST Incl. Seems to do everything but I wondered how much it
did well. Didn't look into it much more.
--
Chris Mayhew using Xnews !

Max 08-07-2003 02:05 AM

Re: digital camera recommendation
 
On Thu, 07 Aug 2003 00:03:08 GMT, Chris Mayhew <me@there.com> wrote:

>will <wsiau@veryhotmail.com> wrote in
>news:3F30A945.90A55FC5@veryhotmail.com:
>
>> i'm looking at buying a digital camera at the moment, images taken will
>> mostly be internet use, and maybe some 4x6 prints occasionally, what's
>> the minimum pixel requirement for such usage?
>>
>> will.

>
>I have been looking at 4 models for just the same thing and came up with
>the following summary but haven't decided what one to buy. None of them
>have Optical Zoom. At 2 MP Digital zoom is more marketing hype than
>anything else. They are all 2 or 2.1 MP. This is just a summary of the
>notes I made about things that interested me not a detailed summary of the
>camera's themselves
>
>Samsung Digimax 201 http://www.samsungcamera.com/
>Ascent $325.71 GST Incl, uses MMC or SD cards. Can be used as a card
>reader so you can transfer files between PC's - the camera appears as a
>removable drive. Comes with a carry case but doesn't appear to have a
>built in lens cover. You can down load the manual as PDF.
>
>Olympus Camedia C150
>Ascent $347.76 GST Incl, uses xD cards which tend to be a lot dearer than
>MMC or SD. Has a cover that slides across lens. Can connect to TV to view
>photo's
>
>Kodak CX4200
>Warehouse Stationery has a special on at $269.99 GST Incl. Pic's look fine
>printed at about 6x4 on photo paper. Camera looks a little cheap. Has
>built in lens cover.
>
>Microtek Take it D1
>Ascent $283.49 GST Incl. Seems to do everything but I wondered how much it
>did well. Didn't look into it much more.



Out of those, there is only one well known quality camera brand.
Olypus do make good cameras, and the extra cost may be worth the piece
of mind.

Max 08-07-2003 02:09 AM

Re: digital camera recommendation
 
Peoples feed back
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/read...odkey=oly_d390


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57