![]() |
SSL Scanner
I am doing some research for a school project on authentication at the
web and the risk for identity theft. How can unauthorized users misuse your identity and get access to classified information. For my research I have tried some programs which stops the TCP-package with headers like HTTP/1.0 and infomation about data submitted by a form e.g. password and username. I have tried two web scanners: 1. Burpsuite which I managed to intercept packeges for HTTP 1.0 and hence was able to read inserted username and password in plaintext. Still it wasn't able to stop SSL-traffic, although it should be able to when turning the "Use SSL"-parameter on. 2. Nikto which is supposed to be a great listener/scanner, but I have not been able to make it work. Is there any programs you would recommend which will handle SSL/TLS? Would for instance a program like Ethereal be able to read packages using SSL protocols? Looking forward to your help. |
Re: SSL Scanner
royend wrote:
> I am doing some research for a school project on authentication at the > web and the risk for identity theft. How can unauthorized users misuse > your identity and get access to classified information. > > For my research I have tried some programs which stops the TCP-package > with headers like HTTP/1.0 and infomation about data submitted by a > form e.g. password and username. > > I have tried two web scanners: > 1. Burpsuite > which I managed to intercept packeges for HTTP 1.0 and hence was able > to read inserted username and password in plaintext. Still it wasn't > able to stop SSL-traffic, although it should be able to when turning > the "Use SSL"-parameter on. > 2. Nikto > which is supposed to be a great listener/scanner, but I have not been > able to make it work. > > Is there any programs you would recommend which will handle SSL/TLS? > Would for instance a program like Ethereal be able to read packages > using SSL protocols? > > Looking forward to your help. > you want to decipher encrypted connections into plaintext ? if that's the case ... bugger off |
Re: SSL Scanner
On 27 Okt, 18:22, goarilla <"kevin DOT paulus AT skynet DOT be">
wrote: > royend wrote: > > I am doing some research for a school project on authentication at the > > web and the risk for identity theft. How can unauthorized users misuse > > your identity and get access to classified information. > > > For my research I have tried some programs which stops the TCP-package > > with headers like HTTP/1.0 and infomation about data submitted by a > > form e.g. password and username. > > > I have tried two web scanners: > > 1. Burpsuite > > which I managed to intercept packeges for HTTP 1.0 and hence was able > > to read inserted username and password in plaintext. Still it wasn't > > able to stop SSL-traffic, although it should be able to when turning > > the "Use SSL"-parameter on. > > 2. Nikto > > which is supposed to be a great listener/scanner, but I have not been > > able to make it work. > > > Is there any programs you would recommend which will handle SSL/TLS? > > Would for instance a program like Ethereal be able to read packages > > using SSL protocols? > > > Looking forward to your help. > > you want to decipher encrypted connections into plaintext ? > if that's the case ... bugger off- Skjul sitert tekst - > > - Vis sitert tekst - Wow... not the kind of reply I was hoping for. And no, I don't need a deciphering tool. What I want is a tool which may scan for packages sent via SSL/TLS, like Burpsuite does with HTTP1.0. This tool lets me read the headers (also possible to alter them before sending them to server, but for my purpose it is only necessary to read). Also, the project focuses on the vulnerability of the web, and I am hoping to shove that even though SSL is implemented the packages might be vulnerable to a Man-In-The-Middle-Attack (please correct me if I am wrong), as the packages might be intercepted by an attacker. Any advice is appreciated for a tool which might help me prove it. |
Re: SSL Scanner
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 royend sent the following transmission through subspace: > the project focuses on the vulnerability of > the web, and I am hoping to shove that even though SSL is implemented > the packages might be vulnerable to a Man-In-The-Middle-Attack (please > correct me if I am wrong), as the packages might be intercepted by an > attacker. If someone intercepts the packages using a man-in-the-middle-attack, the encryption will break, thus alerting the user. You cannot intercept encrypted packages without alerting the user that someone _IS_ intercepting them. Because the certificate will be wrong. - -- Solbu - http://www.solbu.net Remove 'ugyldig.' for email PGP key ID: 0xFA687324 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHJAbBT1rWTfpocyQRAqGlAKCxkpbRHcfiYKUr10lkzQ 9BBC1siwCg9/fW ZpxgxPOj+WIKQd7tmRv8fSo= =wwlT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Re: SSL Scanner
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:22:11 -0700, royend <royend@gmail.com> wrote:
>Is there any programs you would recommend which will handle SSL/TLS? >Would for instance a program like Ethereal be able to read packages >using SSL protocols? Part of the reason that SSL is encrypted is to stop people doing what you propose. So the quick answer is no you can't. -- Jim Watt http://www.gibnet.com |
Re: SSL Scanner
On 28 Okt, 04:49, Solbu <so...@ugyldig.start.no> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > royend sent the following transmission through subspace: > > > the project focuses on the vulnerability of > > the web, and I am hoping to shove that even though SSL is implemented > > the packages might be vulnerable to a Man-In-The-Middle-Attack (please > > correct me if I am wrong), as the packages might be intercepted by an > > attacker. > > If someone intercepts the packages using a man-in-the-middle-attack, > the encryption will break, thus alerting the user. > > You cannot intercept encrypted packages > without alerting the user that someone _IS_ intercepting them. > Because the certificate will be wrong. > > - -- > Solbu -http://www.solbu.net > Remove 'ugyldig.' for email > PGP key ID: 0xFA687324 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFHJAbBT1rWTfpocyQRAqGlAKCxkpbRHcfiYKUr10lkzQ 9BBC1siwCg9/fW > ZpxgxPOj+WIKQd7tmRv8fSo= > =wwlT > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- On 28 Okt, 11:29, Jim Watt <jimw...@aol.no_way> wrote: > On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:22:11 -0700, royend <roy...@gmail.com> wrote: > >Is there any programs you would recommend which will handle SSL/TLS? > >Would for instance a program like Ethereal be able to read packages > >using SSL protocols? > > Explanation why it can't be done... > -- > Jim Watt http://www.gibnet.com That is what I thought (and hoped for...). Can the packages be saved when intercepted and without changing the package be used in a replay attack? royend. |
Re: SSL Scanner
royend wrote:
> On 28 Okt, 04:49, Solbu <so...@ugyldig.start.no> wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> royend sent the following transmission through subspace: >> >>> the project focuses on the vulnerability of >>> the web, and I am hoping to shove that even though SSL is implemented >>> the packages might be vulnerable to a Man-In-The-Middle-Attack (please >>> correct me if I am wrong), as the packages might be intercepted by an >>> attacker. >> If someone intercepts the packages using a man-in-the-middle-attack, >> the encryption will break, thus alerting the user. >> >> You cannot intercept encrypted packages >> without alerting the user that someone _IS_ intercepting them. >> Because the certificate will be wrong. >> >> - -- >> Solbu -http://www.solbu.net >> Remove 'ugyldig.' for email >> PGP key ID: 0xFA687324 >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) >> >> iD8DBQFHJAbBT1rWTfpocyQRAqGlAKCxkpbRHcfiYKUr10lkzQ 9BBC1siwCg9/fW >> ZpxgxPOj+WIKQd7tmRv8fSo= >> =wwlT >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > On 28 Okt, 11:29, Jim Watt <jimw...@aol.no_way> wrote: >> On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:22:11 -0700, royend <roy...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Is there any programs you would recommend which will handle SSL/TLS? >>> Would for instance a program like Ethereal be able to read packages >>> using SSL protocols? >> Explanation why it can't be done... >> -- >> Jim Watt http://www.gibnet.com > > That is what I thought (and hoped for...). > Can the packages be saved when intercepted and without changing the > package be used in a replay attack? > > royend. > :%s/package/packet/g i'm sorry in my native language 'pakket' has both meanings as well but still i know the difference and the appropriate term when using them in english |
Re: SSL Scanner
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:22:11 -0700, royend wrote:
> Is there any programs you would recommend which will handle SSL/TLS? > Would for instance a program like Ethereal be able to read packages > using SSL protocols? Read (view) or decrypt? -- "You can't trust code that you did not totally create yourself" Ken Thompson "Reflections on Trusting Trust" http://www.acm.org/classics/sep95/ |
Re: SSL Scanner
On 28 Okt, 22:00, Ari <arisilverst...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:22:11 -0700, royend wrote: > > Is there any programs you would recommend which will handle SSL/TLS? > > Would for instance a program like Ethereal be able to read packages > > using SSL protocols? > > Read (view) or decrypt? > -- > "You can't trust code that you did not totally create yourself" > Ken Thompson "Reflections on Trusting Trust"http://www.acm.org/classics/sep95/ Basically read (view). I guess the decryption would depend on what kind of encryption is used, which is decided in the SSL handshake? Is it possible to somehow decide what kind of encryption is used by viewing the encrypted text? ALso, thanks to everyone for their contribution to this thread! |
Re: SSL Scanner
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:09:20 -0000, royend <royend@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 28 Okt, 22:00, Ari <arisilverst...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 08:22:11 -0700, royend wrote: >> > Is there any programs you would recommend which will handle SSL/TLS? >> > Would for instance a program like Ethereal be able to read packages >> > using SSL protocols? >> >> Read (view) or decrypt? >> -- >> "You can't trust code that you did not totally create yourself" >> Ken Thompson "Reflections on Trusting Trust"http://www.acm.org/classics/sep95/ > >Basically read (view). >I guess the decryption would depend on what kind of encryption is >used, which is decided in the SSL handshake? Is it possible to somehow >decide what kind of encryption is used by viewing the encrypted text? > >ALso, thanks to everyone for their contribution to this thread! If it was easy then there would be no point in using it. The scheme is designed to keep hackers out. Read the SSL specifications and see. -- Jim Watt http://www.gibnet.com |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 11:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.