![]() |
velocity of subject vs ISO speed
I've been reading and maybe thinking too much about this but have a
technical question for the math geeks out there. Say your subject is traveling at a certain velocity through your field of view at a certain focal length and maximum aperture. And your camera is not panning. The subject is so fast you need an extremely high shutter speed. Even at this shutter speed you cannot get enough light for a proper exposure. And you cannot create artificial light on the subject. So you must increase the ISO. This means there is a relationship between the ISO film speed and the velocity of the subject. Given a certain ISO film speed, focal length, and amount of light, at what velocity can your subject travel through your field of view before you need to increase the film speed? Is there an equation that describes the relationship between velocity of your subject across your field of view and the ISO speed capable of exposing it quick enough? -- DD |
Re: velocity of subject vs ISO speed
Desert Dweller wrote:
> I've been reading and maybe thinking too much about this but have a > technical question for the math geeks out there. > > Say your subject is traveling at a certain velocity through your field > of view at a certain focal length and maximum aperture. And your > camera is not panning. The subject is so fast you need an extremely > high shutter speed. Even at this shutter speed you cannot get enough > light for a proper exposure. And you cannot create artificial light on > the subject. So you must increase the ISO. This means there is a > relationship between the ISO film speed and the velocity of the > subject. > > Given a certain ISO film speed, focal length, and amount of light, at > what velocity can your subject travel through your field of view > before you need to increase the film speed? > > Is there an equation that describes the relationship between velocity > of your subject across your field of view and the ISO speed capable of > exposing it quick enough? > It's not really a direct relationship between the subject velocity and ISO speed, the lens aperture and light available comes into play too. I guess if you wanted to derive an equation for eliminating motion blur, you'd need to take in the pixel size, subject distance, and focal length, so you could calculate the shutter speed so that the subject would move less than 1 pixel in the image while the shutter was open. |
Re: velocity of subject vs ISO speed
Desert Dweller wrote:
> I've been reading and maybe thinking too much about this but have a > technical question for the math geeks out there. > > Say your subject is traveling at a certain velocity through your field > of view at a certain focal length and maximum aperture. And your camera > is not panning. The subject is so fast you need an extremely high > shutter speed. Even at this shutter speed you cannot get enough light > for a proper exposure. And you cannot create artificial light on the > subject. So you must increase the ISO. This means there is a > relationship between the ISO film speed and the velocity of the subject. > > Given a certain ISO film speed, focal length, and amount of light, at > what velocity can your subject travel through your field of view before > you need to increase the film speed? > > Is there an equation that describes the relationship between velocity of > your subject across your field of view and the ISO speed capable of > exposing it quick enough? > > -- > DD Its a simple trig problem. Find out the size of a pixel in your camera, and true focal length. Calculate the angular size of a pixel. For example, a 6 micron pixel and a 300 mm lens )6 microns = 0.006 mm): a = arctan (.006/300) Now for an object at some distance x traveling a velocity y, compute the angular rate: arctan(y/x) (keep units the same, e.g. at 20 meters traveling 1 meter/second gives the angular rate (e.g. degrees/second). For a sharp picture, the exposure time should be less than the angular size of a pixel. Example: if the subject angular rate were 1 degree/second and the size of a pixel with a given lens is 0.001 degree, then you want the exposure time less than 1/1000 second (ideally about 4 times faster, so 1/3000 second). Roger |
Re: velocity of subject vs ISO speed
Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark) wrote:
>> Is there an equation that describes the relationship between >> velocity of your subject across your field of view and the ISO >> speed capable of exposing it quick enough? > Its a simple trig problem. Seems to make sense. I guess I "over thought" that one and was trying to make it harder than it was. -- DD |
Re: velocity of subject vs ISO speed
On Jul 18, 2:21 am, Desert Dweller <1...@invalidemail.org> wrote:
> I've been reading and maybe thinking too much about this but have a > technical question for the math geeks out there. > > Say your subject is traveling at a certain velocity through your field > of view at a certain focal length and maximum aperture. And your camera > is not panning. The subject is so fast you need an extremely high > shutter speed. Even at this shutter speed you cannot get enough light > for a proper exposure. And you cannot create artificial light on the > subject. So you must increase the ISO. This means there is a > relationship between the ISO film speed and the velocity of the subject. > > Given a certain ISO film speed, focal length, and amount of light, at > what velocity can your subject travel through your field of view before > you need to increase the film speed? > > Is there an equation that describes the relationship between velocity of > your subject across your field of view and the ISO speed capable of > exposing it quick enough? > > -- > DD People have actually determined the mft of subject movement. A Perkin Elmer engineer published an excellent paper back in the 70s showing the mtf curve vs angular velocity. You have to change linear movement velocity into angular velocity. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 08:13 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.