Doubts about RDF
I have some doubts about RDF. I hope you can help me with them:
-In http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer, they use the namespace
"http://www.example.org/terms/">", but the URL "http://
does not exist, so it doesn't define any terms. Is this out-of-date?
-Difference between rdf:about and rdf:ID. Can I use only rdf:about?
use only rdf:ID?
-The RDF graph data model is the same in any collection (e.g., using
or "Bag" or "Seq"). How is this possible? It seems it does not make
that the data model is the same...
-When we say something like:
how should I build the entire URI (#triple12345). Is it relative to
current document? Can I omit the "#"?
-Can multiple inheritance be used regarding properties (besides
-Why some of the elements in RDFS are defined with the namespace "rdf"
others with "rdfs"? For example, "rdf:Bag" and "rdfs:Container" or
"rdfs:subclassOf". I would expect all of them defined with "rdfs"
(otherwise, it seems they are part of RDF, although they appear in the
RDFS description). Can anybody clarify me this confusion?
-In the RDF Primer (http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/, Example 26),
are two lines:
My question is: is the second line needed? What does it mean? For me,
makes no sense, as "&xsd;integer" is a standard datatype.
-In the example 29 of that same document, it defines a
xml:base="http://example.org/things". Despite the explanation below, I
don't understand what does this mean or what is the purpose of this. I
think the xml:base could be removed. Any idea?
-In that same example, they clarify that "the range declaration does
automatically assign a datatype to a plain literal, and so a typed
of the appropriate datatype must be explicitly provided". I was
why the datatype should not be assigned implicitly. Is there any
for having to do the user by himself/herself?
-I think I read somewhere the definition of RDF using RDF itself. But
cannot find it now... Can anybody please point me to the place where I
-How is the state of the art in query languages for RDF? Is RQL the
RDQL? Any other?
-If I want to specify a URI that points to a local document. How can I
it? If I indicate that a class is subclass of another class that is
defined in a document whose URI is a URL, every time that a reasoner
this information, does it have to access the URL to check the
definition? Or does it cache the remote document?
-I have read that RDF cannot prevent contradictions, although a
could detect them. What does this mean? I far as I know, if the
can detect it, that's fine. What more could we get? Does OWL provide
something better in this regard?
Thanks a lot in advance,
Re: Doubts about RDF
firstname.lastname@example.org (email@example.com) wrote:
: Hi everybody,
: I have some doubts about RDF. I hope you can help me with them:
: -In http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer, they use the namespace
: "http://www.example.org/terms/">", but the URL "http://
: does not exist, so it doesn't define any terms. Is this out-of-date?
A name space is not a web site, it has no need to exist. It is just a
string used as a name in an xml file. Now ask yourself, What if you
wanted to combine two xml files created by two different authors that both
used the same name for different things? That would be inconvenient - it
is very useful if different authors can guarantee they always use
different names. The best way to ensure different authors use different
names is for each author to include their own domain name as part of the
name. If every author does that then every name will always be unique,
since noone else will ever use the same name.
|All times are GMT. The time now is 03:22 PM.|
Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.