![]() |
SPA-1001
Hi,
SPA-1001's are back in stock again. The unique point is being able to run 2 SIP accounts on 1 phone for inbound and outbound calls. Tim |
Re: SPA-1001
Tim expressed precisely :
> Hi, > > SPA-1001's are back in stock again. > > > The unique point is being able to run 2 SIP accounts on 1 phone for > inbound and outbound calls. > > Tim Mine arrived today. Thanks for the speedy service! |
Re: SPA-1001
"Tim" <nutnews@kooky.org> wrote in message news:461e1b61$0$760$bed64819@news.gradwell.net... > SPA-1001's are back in stock again. > > The unique point is being able to run 2 SIP accounts on 1 phone for > inbound and outbound calls. I hope they have better firmware than the 2100 then, which can handle two accounts in theory, but gets confused if you try it in practice (refuses incoming calls but appears OK because outgoing calls work). Still waiting for an upgrade that fixes this... -- Phil McKerracher www.mckerracher.net |
Re: SPA-1001
Phil McKerracher brought next idea :
> "Tim" <nutnews@kooky.org> wrote in message > news:461e1b61$0$760$bed64819@news.gradwell.net... >> SPA-1001's are back in stock again. >> >> The unique point is being able to run 2 SIP accounts on 1 phone for >> inbound and outbound calls. > > I hope they have better firmware than the 2100 then, which can handle two > accounts in theory, but gets confused if you try it in practice (refuses > incoming calls but appears OK because outgoing calls work). Still waiting > for an upgrade that fixes this... I have a 2100 that runs as expected, with no problems. Which firmware are you using? Mine's Software Version: 2.0.5(a). Never got round to updating it. |
Re: SPA-1001
Phil McKerracher wrote:
> I hope they have better firmware than the 2100 then, which can handle two > accounts in theory, but gets confused if you try it in practice (refuses > incoming calls but appears OK because outgoing calls work). Still waiting > for an upgrade that fixes this... I've never heard anybody say that before. Tim |
Re: SPA-1001
"Jono" <nothanks@blueyonder.invalid> wrote in message news:mn.7cc47d74883d6ebd.48968@blueyonder.invalid. .. > Phil McKerracher brought next idea : > > "Tim" <nutnews@kooky.org> wrote in message > > news:461e1b61$0$760$bed64819@news.gradwell.net... > >> SPA-1001's are back in stock again. > >> > >> The unique point is being able to run 2 SIP accounts on 1 phone for > >> inbound and outbound calls. > > > > I hope they have better firmware than the 2100 then, which can handle two > > accounts in theory, but gets confused if you try it in practice (refuses > > incoming calls but appears OK because outgoing calls work). Still waiting > > for an upgrade that fixes this... > > I have a 2100 that runs as expected, with no problems. Which firmware > are you using? > > Mine's Software Version: 2.0.5(a). Never got round to updating it. Mine's running 3.2.5(d) allegedly |
Re: SPA-1001
Phil McKerracher formulated on Sunday :
> "Jono" <nothanks@blueyonder.invalid> wrote in message > news:mn.7cc47d74883d6ebd.48968@blueyonder.invalid. .. >> Phil McKerracher brought next idea : >>> "Tim" <nutnews@kooky.org> wrote in message >>> news:461e1b61$0$760$bed64819@news.gradwell.net... >>>> SPA-1001's are back in stock again. >>>> >>>> The unique point is being able to run 2 SIP accounts on 1 phone for >>>> inbound and outbound calls. >>> >>> I hope they have better firmware than the 2100 then, which can handle two >>> accounts in theory, but gets confused if you try it in practice (refuses >>> incoming calls but appears OK because outgoing calls work). Still waiting >>> for an upgrade that fixes this... >> >> I have a 2100 that runs as expected, with no problems. Which firmware >> are you using? >> >> Mine's Software Version: 2.0.5(a). Never got round to updating it. > > Mine's running 3.2.5(d) allegedly I don't suppose you're trying two simultaneous calls with two accounts from the same service provider, are you, by any chance? |
Re: SPA-1001
"Jono" <nothanks@blueyonder.invalid> wrote in message news:mn.b2f77d7447d292ce.48968@blueyonder.invalid. .. > Phil McKerracher formulated on Sunday : > > "Jono" <nothanks@blueyonder.invalid> wrote in message > > news:mn.7cc47d74883d6ebd.48968@blueyonder.invalid. .. > >> Phil McKerracher brought next idea : > >>> "Tim" <nutnews@kooky.org> wrote in message > >>> news:461e1b61$0$760$bed64819@news.gradwell.net... > >>>> SPA-1001's are back in stock again. > >>>> > >>>> The unique point is being able to run 2 SIP accounts on 1 phone for > >>>> inbound and outbound calls. > >>> > >>> I hope they have better firmware than the 2100 then, which can handle two > >>> accounts in theory, but gets confused if you try it in practice (refuses > >>> incoming calls but appears OK because outgoing calls work). Still waiting > >>> for an upgrade that fixes this... > >> > >> I have a 2100 that runs as expected, with no problems. Which firmware > >> are you using? > >> > >> Mine's Software Version: 2.0.5(a). Never got round to updating it. > > > > Mine's running 3.2.5(d) allegedly > > I don't suppose you're trying two simultaneous calls with two accounts > from the same service provider, are you, by any chance? Different providers actually, but AFAIK most providers allow simultaneous calls anyway, don't they? Indeed, that's one of the big benefits of VoIP over POTS. -- Phil McKerracher www.mckerracher.net |
Re: SPA-1001
Phil McKerracher brought next idea :
>> I don't suppose you're trying two simultaneous calls with two accounts >> from the same service provider, are you, by any chance? > > Different providers actually, but AFAIK most providers allow simultaneous > calls anyway, don't they? Indeed, that's one of the big benefits of VoIP > over POTS. Was just thinking aloud, really. Got different ports set on each line? Port forwarding correctly? What happens if you place the device in your router's DMZ? Are you, in fact, using the SPA2100 as a router? |
Re: SPA-1001
Jono wrote:
> Got different ports set on each line? Port forwarding correctly? What > happens if you place the device in your router's DMZ? Are you, in fact, > using the SPA2100 as a router? > Different local ports for both lines on SPA devices is important. Loads of people think `um, SIP, should be port 5060` and then change the local SIP port. Tim |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 05:38 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.