![]() |
Windows Media Encoder 9 Series x64 Edition - English
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...DisplayLang=en
-- Barb Bowman MS Windows-MVP Expert Zone Columnist http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/e...ts/bowman.mspx http://blogs.digitalmediaphile.com/barb/ |
Re: Windows Media Encoder 9 Series x64 Edition - English
Does anyone have any benchmarks on this vs. the 32-bit edition? I've
been waiting for this for quite some time. :) |
Re: Windows Media Encoder 9 Series x64 Edition - English
no benchmarks. maybe over the weekend..
On 18 Nov 2005 13:12:22 -0800, blu_vg@hotmail.com wrote: >Does anyone have any benchmarks on this vs. the 32-bit edition? I've >been waiting for this for quite some time. :) -- Barb Bowman MS Windows-MVP Expert Zone Columnist http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/e...ts/bowman.mspx http://blogs.digitalmediaphile.com/barb/ |
Re: Windows Media Encoder 9 Series x64 Edition - English
Microsoft mentions on this site
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/win.../versions.aspx that the x64 version is "not yet fully optimized" for "Encoding high-quality SD content". (SD = standard definition) I just did two tests which actually confirm this. Converting a regular DV AVI file (from my video camera) to WMV was ca. 10% slower with the x64 encoder in Windows XP x64 Edition compared to the 32-bit encoder running in Windows XP. Converting a high bitrate WMV file (720x576 resolution) to a lower bitrate WMV file was ca. 15% slower using the 64-bit encoder. <blu_vg@hotmail.com> :1132348342.576185.314000@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups .com... > Does anyone have any benchmarks on this vs. the 32-bit edition? I've > been waiting for this for quite some time. :) > |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 09:22 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.