Velocity Reviews

Velocity Reviews (http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/index.php)
-   Computer Support (http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/f33-computer-support.html)
-   -   Nvidia graphics cards (http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/t469653-nvidia-graphics-cards.html)

Budweiser 04-15-2006 10:52 PM

Nvidia graphics cards
 
Greetings all and one.
Dead simple question for you all.
Currently i have a MSI FX 5600 installed with 128Mb on the card ---An AGP
style one
Main system is based on a Soltek SL-86MP-L Which is AGP 4/8 compatable.
2.4 Pentium and 2Gb of DDR 400 ram.
I have recently aquired a box full of BFG Tech cards----FX5700 OC 256 on
the board ,the OC stands for overclocked, should i bother swapping mine out
,or just leave it alone as in real tearms it is not a huge leap forward in
technology, i dont play games but i do do alot of bryce and poser work.
Basically is the extra DDR on the card plus the upgrade performance going to
show a difference in real time?



fred-bloggs 04-16-2006 08:59 AM

Re: Nvidia graphics cards
 
"Budweiser" <herethere@everywhere.com> wrote in
news:2Pe0g.19809$ic1.6544@newsfe5-win.ntli.net:

> Greetings all and one.
> Dead simple question for you all.
> Currently i have a MSI FX 5600 installed with 128Mb on the card ---An
> AGP style one
> Main system is based on a Soltek SL-86MP-L Which is AGP 4/8
> compatable. 2.4 Pentium and 2Gb of DDR 400 ram.
> I have recently aquired a box full of BFG Tech cards----FX5700 OC
> 256 on the board ,the OC stands for overclocked, should i bother
> swapping mine out ,or just leave it alone as in real tearms it is not
> a huge leap forward in technology, i dont play games but i do do alot
> of bryce and poser work. Basically is the extra DDR on the card plus
> the upgrade performance going to show a difference in real time?
>
>


There is an updated GPU on the 5700 as well as faster chip clock and
faster RAM. This is a test of games on various cards including the 5600
and 5700
http://tomshardware.co.uk/2004/10/04..._iv/page5.html

The 5700 *shouldn't* be any slower but I don't think you'll notice any
difference.

--
fred

Budweiser 04-16-2006 09:58 PM

Re: Nvidia graphics cards
 

"fred-bloggs" <fred-bloggs@hahahotmail.com> wrote in message
news:44420783$0$64664$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readf reenews.net...
> "Budweiser" <herethere@everywhere.com> wrote in
> news:2Pe0g.19809$ic1.6544@newsfe5-win.ntli.net:
>
>> Greetings all and one.
>> Dead simple question for you all.
>> Currently i have a MSI FX 5600 installed with 128Mb on the card ---An
>> AGP style one
>> Main system is based on a Soltek SL-86MP-L Which is AGP 4/8
>> compatable. 2.4 Pentium and 2Gb of DDR 400 ram.
>> I have recently aquired a box full of BFG Tech cards----FX5700 OC
>> 256 on the board ,the OC stands for overclocked, should i bother
>> swapping mine out ,or just leave it alone as in real tearms it is not
>> a huge leap forward in technology, i dont play games but i do do alot
>> of bryce and poser work. Basically is the extra DDR on the card plus
>> the upgrade performance going to show a difference in real time?
>>
>>

>
> There is an updated GPU on the 5700 as well as faster chip clock and
> faster RAM. This is a test of games on various cards including the 5600
> and 5700
> http://tomshardware.co.uk/2004/10/04..._iv/page5.html
>
> The 5700 *shouldn't* be any slower but I don't think you'll notice any
> difference.
>
> --
> fred


Thanks for the input---kind of what i had found---going to ebay the cards
,if i can be bothered i may swop mine out.I do not game but it may help a
little with render on bryce and poser.




All times are GMT. The time now is 12:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57