![]() |
Array and Pointer Tutorial
Some programmers treat arrays just like pointers (and some even think that
they're exactly equivalent). I'm going to demonstrate the differences. Firstly, let's assume that we're working on a platform which has the following properties: 1) char's are 8-Bit. ( "char" is synomonous with "byte" ). 2) int's are 32-Bit. ( sizeof(int) == 4 ). 3) Pointers are 64-Bit. ( sizeof(int*) == 8 ). First let's make two declarations: int main(void) { int array[5]; int* const pointer = (int*)malloc( 5 * sizeof(int) ); } Now I'll demonstrate how "array" and "pointer" are different: I'll start off with simple analgous expressions: ================================================== ========================== | Expression | Type and Access Specifiers | That in English | ================================================== ========================== | | | | | array | int[5] | An array of five int's.| | | | | |--------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | |A const pointer which | | pointer | int* const |points to a modifiable | | | |int. | |--------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | |A const pointer which | | &array | int (* const)[5] |points to a modifiable | | | |array of five int's. | |--------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | |A const pointer, which | | &pointer | int* const* const |points to a const | | | |pointer, which points to| | | |a modifiable int. | ================================================== ========================== Here's how "sizeof" works with them: ================================================== ========= | Expression | sizeof( exp ) | But Why? | ================================================== ========= | | | | | array | 20 | It's five int's. | | | (5 * 4) | | |---------------------------------------------------------| | | | | | pointer | 8 | It's just a pointer.| | | (just 8) | | |---------------------------------------------------------| | | | | | &array | 8 | It's just a pointer.| | | (just 8) | | |---------------------------------------------------------- | | | | | &pointer | 8 | It's just a pointer.| | | | | | | (just 8) | | ================================================== ========= Okay next thing to discuss is the usage of square brackets, and the dereference operator. The two of these are to be used by pointers only. So how come we can use them with arrays, as follows?: array[0] = 4; *array = 6; The reason is that an expression of the following type: int[5] can implicitly convert to an expression of the following type: int* const What it does is convert to a pointer to the first element of the array. Therefore, the first example: array[0] = 4; implicitly converts "array" to a normal pointer, then uses chain brackets to access memory at a certain offset from the original address. Also the second example: *array = 6; implicitly converts "array" to a normal pointer, then dereferences it. NOTE: You must remember that an array implicitly converts to a pointer to its first element, NOT to a pointer to the array. This fact has a few implications. Here's one such implication: *(array + 3) = 6; What the above line of code does is the following: 1) Implicitly converts "array" to an: int* const 2) Adds 3 * sizeof(int) to the address. 3) Dereferences the resulting pointer, and assigns 6 to it. If "array" implicitly converted to: int (*)[5] rather than a pointer to the first element, then Step 2 above would be different, specifically: 2) Adds 3 * sizeof( int[5] ) to the address. And we know that sizeof(int[5]) is 20 on this platform (not 8!). So you may ask, "What's the point in having a pointer to an array?" -- well here's where it may come in handy: void SomeFunc ( int (* const p_array)[5] ) { (*p_array)[0] = 99; (*p_array)[1] = 98; (*p_array)[2] = 97; (*p_array)[3] = 96; (*p_array)[4] = 95; /* This function won't accept an array of any other size! */ } And here's a C++-specific example with references: void SomeFunc ( int (&array)[5] ) { array[0] = 99; array[1] = 98; array[2] = 97; array[3] = 96; array[4] = 95; /* This function won't accept an array of any other size! */ } Also in C++, you can exploit the use of templates: template<class T, unsigned long len> void KeepCopy( const T (&array)[len] ) { static my_array[len]; /* Do some other stuff */ } I've posted this to a few newsgroups, so if you'd like to reply, please post to comp.lang.c because it's the common denominator. If your post is C++- specific, the please post to comp.lang.c++. Did I leave anything out? -Tomás [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ] [ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ] -- comp.lang.c.moderated - moderation address: clcm@plethora.net -- you must have an appropriate newsgroups line in your header for your mail to be seen, or the newsgroup name in square brackets in the subject line. Sorry. |
Re: Array and Pointer Tutorial
Tomás wrote:
> Some programmers treat arrays just like pointers (and some even think that > they're exactly equivalent). I'm going to demonstrate the differences. Some of these days you can also write an article demonstrating that integer types are not floating point types. It will be another great contribution to the progress of humanity. -- Salu2 Inviato da X-Privat.Org - Registrazione gratuita http://www.x-privat.org/join.php |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 03:59 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.