![]() |
bind() and SIGSEGV when usign UDP
Hi, i got problem
when i bind in this way: local_addr.sin_family = AF_INET; local_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = inet_addr("127.0.0.1"); local_addr.sin_port = htons(CLIENT_PORT); i can easly bind port without any SIGSEGV (segmentation fault) but MSDN wrote: "If an application does not care what local address is assigned, specify the manifest constant value ADDR_ANY for the sa_data member of the name parameter. This allows the underlying service provider to use any appropriate network address, potentially simplifying application programming in the presence of multihomed hosts (that is, hosts that have more than one network interface and address)." so how write this? What is diference betwean ADDR_ANY and INADDR_ANY? Thiese lines are wrong cause makes SIGSEGV: local_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl(ADDR_ANY); local_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = htons(ADDR_ANY); local_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl(INADDR_ANY); local_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = htons(INADDR_ANY); local_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = INADDR_ANY; local_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = ADDR_ANY; Plz help me... |
Re: bind() and SIGSEGV when usign UDP
USUN_TO wrote:
> [redacted] You're OT here. Ask in comp.unix.programmer. |
Re: bind() and SIGSEGV when usign UDP
USUN_TO wrote:
> Hi, i got problem > > when i bind in this way: > > local_addr.sin_family = AF_INET; > local_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = inet_addr("127.0.0.1"); > local_addr.sin_port = htons(CLIENT_PORT); > > i can easly bind port without any SIGSEGV (segmentation fault) but MSDN > wrote: > > "If an application does not care what local address is assigned, specify > the manifest constant value ADDR_ANY for the sa_data member of the name > parameter. This allows the underlying service provider to use any > appropriate network address, potentially simplifying application > programming in the presence of multihomed hosts (that is, hosts that > have more than one network interface and address)." > > so how write this? What is diference betwean ADDR_ANY and INADDR_ANY? > > Thiese lines are wrong cause makes SIGSEGV: > > local_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl(ADDR_ANY); > local_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = htons(ADDR_ANY); > local_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl(INADDR_ANY); > local_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = htons(INADDR_ANY); > local_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = INADDR_ANY; > local_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = ADDR_ANY; > > Plz help me... Your posting appears to be from a Windows machine. If you're asking about the bind() found in the Windows Winsock lib ("Windows Sockets 2"), then you might get help in a Windows newsgroup. If you're asking about the socket bind() in Unix or Linux networking, then you'll have to ask for help in a newsgroup for the appropriate OS. Regards, Larry |
Re: bind() and SIGSEGV when usign UDP
USUN_TO wrote:
> Hi, i got problem > > when i bind in this way: > > local_addr.sin_family = AF_INET; > local_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = inet_addr("127.0.0.1"); > local_addr.sin_port = htons(CLIENT_PORT); > > i can easly bind port without any SIGSEGV (segmentation fault) but MSDN > wrote: > > "If an application does not care what local address is assigned, specify > the manifest constant value ADDR_ANY for the sa_data member of the name > parameter. This allows the underlying service provider to use any > appropriate network address, potentially simplifying application > programming in the presence of multihomed hosts (that is, hosts that > have more than one network interface and address)." > > so how write this? What is diference betwean ADDR_ANY and INADDR_ANY? > > Thiese lines are wrong cause makes SIGSEGV: > > local_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl(ADDR_ANY); > local_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = htons(ADDR_ANY); > local_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl(INADDR_ANY); > local_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = htons(INADDR_ANY); > local_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = INADDR_ANY; > local_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = ADDR_ANY; > > Plz help me... Below is a function extracted from one of my older C++ libs for Windows. Ignore the calls to IsOpen() and Close(), they reside elsewhere, but the code may still help you find your problem. Remember to add '#include <winsock.h>' in your code. int ServerIpSocket::BindToPort(int port, int queueSize) { SOCKADDR_IN serverSockAddr; int status; // if already associated with a port, close if (IsOpen()) Close(); /* MANDATORY - zero the sockaddr_in structure */ memset (&serverSockAddr, 0, sizeof (serverSockAddr)); /* specify the port portion of the address */ serverSockAddr.sin_port = htons ((u_short)port); /* specify the address family as Internet */ serverSockAddr.sin_family = AF_INET; /* specify that the address does not matter */ serverSockAddr.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl (INADDR_ANY); /* create a socket */ theSocket = socket (AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0); if (theSocket == INVALID_SOCKET) { cerr << "ERROR: socket unsuccessful" << endl; return (-1); } /* associate the socket with the address */ status = bind (theSocket, (LPSOCKADDR) & serverSockAddr, sizeof (serverSockAddr)); if (status == SOCKET_ERROR) { cerr << "ERROR: bind unsuccessful" << endl; // close theSocket opened by the above socket() call Close(); return (-1); } // allow the socket to take connections. // specify a waiting connection queue size status = listen (theSocket, queueSize); if (status == SOCKET_ERROR) { cerr << "ERROR: listen unsuccessful" << endl; // close theSocket opened by the above socket() call Close(); return (-1); } // NOTE: For this socket class, we are NEVER connected to a client. // ConnectToClient() will create/return a NEW socket to handle // each client connection. Therefore we NEVER set "isConn" to // non-zero for this class (ie: IsConnected() always returns // zero) return 0; } Regards, Larry |
Re: bind() and SIGSEGV when usign UDP
Larry I Smith napisał(a):
> USUN_TO wrote: > Thx a lot Larry but the same code under linux works fine and the same (of course changing to WinSock spec. ) when i bind UDP i got SIGSEGV (segmentation fault) but when i continue program works fine (not always stable - so i tracking errors) |
Re: bind() and SIGSEGV when usign UDP
USUN_TO wrote:
> Larry I Smith napisał(a): >> USUN_TO wrote: >> > > Thx a lot Larry but the same code under linux works fine and the same > (of course changing to WinSock spec. ) when i bind UDP i got SIGSEGV > (segmentation fault) but when i continue program works fine (not always > stable - so i tracking errors) Is the return value of bind() WSAEACCES? If it is, then (from the MSDN ref for Winsock), this might be the problem: <quote> Attempt to connect datagram socket to broadcast address failed because setsockopt() option SO_BROADCAST is not enabled. </quote> To use datagrams you have to enable SO_BROADCAST by calling setsocketopt() before doing the bind(). See the MSDN Winsock docs for setsocketopt() for details. http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...tsockopt_2.asp Regards, Larry |
OT: bind() and SIGSEGV when usign UDP
USUN_TO wrote:
> Larry I Smith napisał(a): > >> USUN_TO wrote: >> > > Thx a lot Larry but the same code under linux works fine and the same > (of course changing to WinSock spec. ) when i bind UDP i got SIGSEGV > (segmentation fault) but when i continue program works fine (not always > stable - so i tracking errors) This is OT, but... The other thing under Winsock is to make damn sure you call WSAStartup. |
Re: OT: bind() and SIGSEGV when usign UDP
> The other thing under Winsock is to make damn sure you call WSAStartup.
I use Bcc32 5.5 and Newes MiniGW (from Dev-Cpp 4.9.9.2 with update) and got thesame SIGSEGV : http://republika.pl/aao_auth/UDP.rar there is the source and plz use GDB as debugger |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.