if and for statements
 

is this:
....
....
....
for (i = 0; i <16; i++)
{
if (arg & j) a++;
j <<= 2;
}

return (a & 1);
....
....
....

the same as:
for (i = 0; i <16; i++)
{
if (arg & j)
{
a++;
}

j <<= 2;

}

return (a & 1);

Re: if and for statements
 

Yes

Re: if and for statements
 

mario.demiguel@gmail.com wrote:

> Yes

It is proper Usenet etiquette to include the text you are replying to.
To do this using Google groups, please follow the instructions below,
penned by Keith Thompson:

If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
"show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
"Reply" at the bottom of the article headers.

--
Christopher Benson-Manica | I *should* know what I'm talking about - if I
ataru(at)cyberspace.org | don't, I need to know. Flames welcome.

Re: if and for statements
 

mario.demiguel@gmail.com wrote:

> Yes

Yes, what?

--
Please quote enough of the previous message for context. To do so from
Google, click "show options" and use the Reply shown in the expanded
header.

Re: if and for statements
 

"Default User" <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> writes:
> mario.demiguel@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Yes
>
> Yes, what?

Yes, Sir?

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this.

Re: if and for statements
 

Paminu wrote:
>
> is this:
[... code that differs only at ...]

> if (arg & j) a++;

[...and...]

> if (arg & j)
> {
> a++;
> }

[... the same? ...]

Yes.

--
+-------------------------+--------------------+-----------------------------+
| Kenneth J. Brody | www.hvcomputer.com | |
| kenbrody/at\spamcop.net | www.fptech.com | #include <std_disclaimer.h> |
+-------------------------+--------------------+-----------------------------+
Don't e-mail me at: <mailto:ThisIsASpamTrap@gmail.com>

Re: if and for statements
 

On Tue, 04 Oct 2005 21:45:44 +0200, Paminu <jadajada@asd.com> wrote:

>is this:
>...
>...
>...
>for (i = 0; i <16; i++)
>{
> if (arg & j) a++;
> j <<= 2;
>}
>
>return (a & 1);
>...
>...
>...
>
>the same as:
>for (i = 0; i <16; i++)
>{
> if (arg & j)
> {
> a++;
> }

Yes. If the "range" of the if is a single statement, the braces are
optional.

>
> j <<= 2;
>
>}
>
>return (a & 1);


<<Remove the del for email>>

Re: if and for statements
 

Groovy hepcat Keith Thompson was jivin' on Tue, 04 Oct 2005 20:46:43
GMT in comp.lang.c.
Re: if and for statements's a cool scene! Dig it!

>"Default User" <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> writes:
>> mario.demiguel@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> Yes
>>
>> Yes, what?
>
>Yes, Sir?

Yes, Sir, three bags full, Sir. :)

--

Dig the even newer still, yet more improved, sig!

http://alphalink.com.au/~phaywood/
"Ain't I'm a dog?" - Ronny Self, Ain't I'm a Dog, written by G. Sherry & W. Walker.
I know it's not "technically correct" English; but since when was rock & roll "technically correct"?

[ot]Re: if and for statements
 

Peter Shaggy Haywood wrote:
>
> Groovy hepcat Keith Thompson was jivin' on Tue, 04 Oct 2005 20:46:43
> GMT in comp.lang.c.
> Re: if and for statements's a cool scene! Dig it!
>
> >"Default User" <defaultuserbr@yahoo.com> writes:
> >> mario.demiguel@gmail.com wrote:
> >>
> >>> Yes
> >>
> >> Yes, what?
> >
> >Yes, Sir?
>
> Yes, Sir, three bags full, Sir. :)

One for the little boy who lives down the drain.

"Lane" was not in my vocabulary when I learned this.

--
pete