Velocity Reviews

Velocity Reviews (http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/index.php)
-   Digital Photography (http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/f37-digital-photography.html)
-   -   Portraits with Non-DSLR digital camera (http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/t415250-portraits-with-non-dslr-digital-camera.html)

Wes 05-16-2005 01:11 AM

Portraits with Non-DSLR digital camera
 
Hi. I want to buy a Non-DSLR digital camera that is capable of shooting
good portraits of people. Can you suggest some models for me to check
into? Here is an example of the type of portraits I like:
http://www.lowgenius.net/cuz_u_care.htm

Thanks in advance for help. I'm new to digital cameras.

Wes






_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 120,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

Sheldon 05-16-2005 02:45 AM

Re: Portraits with Non-DSLR digital camera
 

"Wes" <wes.bless3@example.com> wrote in message
news:T$R$284050@example.com...
> Hi. I want to buy a Non-DSLR digital camera that is capable of shooting
> good portraits of people. Can you suggest some models for me to check
> into? Here is an example of the type of portraits I like:
> http://www.lowgenius.net/cuz_u_care.htm
>
> Thanks in advance for help. I'm new to digital cameras.
>
> Wes


This may hurt, but that ain't the best portrait I've ever seen. I'd
consider that a snapshot. Just about any digital camera would do.

If you want portraits like these (just did a quick Google search) you're
probably going to want to up the ante a bit.

http://portfolio.kevinthom.com/portr..._contemplation



Frank ess 05-16-2005 04:28 AM

Re: Portraits with Non-DSLR digital camera
 
Sheldon wrote:
> "Wes" <wes.bless3@example.com> wrote in message
> news:T$R$284050@example.com...
>> Hi. I want to buy a Non-DSLR digital camera that is capable of
>> shooting good portraits of people. Can you suggest some models for
>> me to check into? Here is an example of the type of portraits I
>> like:
>> http://www.lowgenius.net/cuz_u_care.htm
>>
>> Thanks in advance for help. I'm new to digital cameras.
>>
>> Wes

>
> This may hurt, but that ain't the best portrait I've ever seen. I'd
> consider that a snapshot. Just about any digital camera would do.
>
> If you want portraits like these (just did a quick Google search)
> you're probably going to want to up the ante a bit.
>
> http://portfolio.kevinthom.com/portr..._contemplation


I like that (Kevin Thom) Lara photo, but I don't think it is all that
great, either; or maybe he lost her nose on purpose.

I think the OP is looking for something that will make relatively
close-up pictures with recognizable characteristics of the people
whose representations he produces, not necessarily rising to the
definition of "portrait" as is conventionally and conveniently used.
Presumptuous, I know.

Here are a few from three cameras. Presumptuous again, to call the
album "Portrait", bu a good deal handier than "Pictures of peoples'
faces that may show a little of who they are in fewer than a thousand
words".
http://www.fototime.com/inv/446F91A7688BF04


--
Frank ess


Paul Furman 05-16-2005 04:52 AM

Re: Portraits with Non-DSLR digital camera
 
Frank ess wrote:

> Sheldon wrote:
>
>>
>> If you want portraits like these (just did a quick Google search)
>> you're probably going to want to up the ante a bit.
>>
>> http://portfolio.kevinthom.com/portr..._contemplation

>
>
> I like that (Kevin Thom) Lara photo, but I don't think it is all that
> great, either; or maybe he lost her nose on purpose.
>
> I think the OP is looking for something that will make relatively
> close-up pictures with recognizable characteristics of the people whose
> representations he produces, not necessarily rising to the definition of
> "portrait" as is conventionally and conveniently used. Presumptuous, I
> know.



Is that a piercing *inside* her nose???! Maybe a reason to lose the tip
of the nose <g>.


>
> Here are a few from three cameras. Presumptuous again, to call the album
> "Portrait", bu a good deal handier than "Pictures of peoples' faces that
> may show a little of who they are in fewer than a thousand words".
> http://www.fototime.com/inv/446F91A7688BF04
>
>


--
Paul Furman
http://www.edgehill.net/1
san francisco native plants

Craig Flory 05-16-2005 12:35 PM

Re: Portraits with Non-DSLR digital camera
 
Hi Wes; There is an old saying among professional photographers "it
is not the camera , it's the photographer". I have seen some great photos
done with a pin-hole camera or an instamatic. If you learn composition,
lighting, and other dynamics ... as well as Photoshop, Photoshop Elements or
another good program, the camera will be less imporatant. One thing to
remember about the difference between point & shoot & SLR style ..... point
& shoot cameras have paralax problems. That means that you view through a
viewfinder & not through the lens. So what you see is not what get. Things
are not where you saw them in the viewfinder. So if you do buy a point &
shoot, make sure it has a lot of megapixels. You will need to back up and
not get too close because of paralax. If you do you can then crop in
tighter. Besides that, go for a camera with a fair amount of optical zoom.
Get one that has a tripod socket on the bottom so you can put it on a
tripod. I hope these things help. Craig Flory



Trev 05-16-2005 12:46 PM

Re: Portraits with Non-DSLR digital camera
 

"Wes" <wes.bless3@example.com> wrote in message
news:T$R$284050@example.com...
> Hi. I want to buy a Non-DSLR digital camera that is capable of shooting
> good portraits of people. Can you suggest some models for me to check
> into? Here is an example of the type of portraits I like:
> http://www.lowgenius.net/cuz_u_care.htm
>
> Thanks in advance for help. I'm new to digital cameras.
>
> Wes
>

At least 3 MP and with a zoom that reaches 105 to 120 (35mm equivalent) will
do, the rest is up to you. What feels best Ect. For serious control being
able to select Aperture priority and maybe the use of off camera flash might
be more important. Or even does it look expensive if you charging for your
work.



Randall Ainsworth 05-16-2005 01:10 PM

Re: Portraits with Non-DSLR digital camera
 
In article <d_6dnfWe75mllBXfRVn-iQ@comcast.com>, Sheldon
<sheldon@XXXXXXXXsopris.net> wrote:

> http://portfolio.kevinthom.com/portr..._contemplation


Boy, I'm glad I'm out of the portrait business. It would drive me nuts
to have these kids coming in with their faces looking like they fell
face-down in a tackle box. :-)

Diane Wilson 05-16-2005 01:30 PM

Re: Portraits with Non-DSLR digital camera
 
In article <Aa-dnY0-hryVuhXfRVn-qA@speakeasy.net>, paul-@-edgehill.net
says...
> Frank ess wrote:
>
> > Sheldon wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> If you want portraits like these (just did a quick Google search)
> >> you're probably going to want to up the ante a bit.
> >>
> >> http://portfolio.kevinthom.com/portr..._contemplation

> >
> >
> > I like that (Kevin Thom) Lara photo, but I don't think it is all that
> > great, either; or maybe he lost her nose on purpose.
> >
> > I think the OP is looking for something that will make relatively
> > close-up pictures with recognizable characteristics of the people whose
> > representations he produces, not necessarily rising to the definition of
> > "portrait" as is conventionally and conveniently used. Presumptuous, I
> > know.

>
>
> Is that a piercing *inside* her nose???! Maybe a reason to lose the tip
> of the nose <g>.


Yeah, she has two piercings in her nose, but it's still flawed
lighting.

Diane

Diane Wilson 05-16-2005 01:49 PM

Re: Portraits with Non-DSLR digital camera
 
In article <Jc6dnddePci7CxXfRVnyiA@pipex.net>, "Trev"
<trevbowdenATdsl.pipexDOTnet> says...
>
> "Wes" <wes.bless3@example.com> wrote in message
> news:T$R$284050@example.com...
> > Hi. I want to buy a Non-DSLR digital camera that is capable of shooting
> > good portraits of people. Can you suggest some models for me to check
> > into? Here is an example of the type of portraits I like:
> > http://www.lowgenius.net/cuz_u_care.htm
> >
> > Thanks in advance for help. I'm new to digital cameras.
> >
> > Wes
> >

> At least 3 MP and with a zoom that reaches 105 to 120 (35mm equivalent) will
> do, the rest is up to you. What feels best Ect. For serious control being
> able to select Aperture priority and maybe the use of off camera flash might
> be more important. Or even does it look expensive if you charging for your
> work.
>
>
>

For indoor portraits, off-camera flash is just about essential.
Sometimes you can get by with just a bounce, along with *something*
to fill shadows (reflector, maybe one that's built in to the
flash).

Indoors or outdoors, for portraits, lighting is more important
than the camera. Outdoors, you have to learn to read the light,
and learn to shoot with the light you've got. Indoors, you
have to create the lighting you want, which is harder, but will
give you tremendous range and flexibility. The camera has to
have the right flash sync connections to trigger your lighting
gear, and it needs a good lens to record the quality that you
want.

I have to agree with Sheldon; that's a snapshot, not a portrait.
Before picking a camera, try looking at a book on portrait
lighting, decide how far you want to go with it and what your
budget can support, then pick lighting and camera equipment
as a group. I like this book, because it shows a wide
variety of portraits by a number of photographers, and shows
how the lighting was set up:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg.../-/0823065227/

Diane

Mulperi 05-16-2005 02:50 PM

Re: Portraits with Non-DSLR digital camera
 
http://personal.inet.fi/koti/juha.he.../Potraits.html


--
Juha Heinonen
Seilimaki 17 B 8
02180 ESPOO
FINLAND
E-mail: juha.heinonen@pp2REMOVE.inet.fi
URL: http://personal.inet.fi/koti/juha.heinonen




All times are GMT. The time now is 04:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.