![]() |
Another reason NOT to use Internet Explorer
|
Re: Another reason NOT to use Internet Explorer
"Ryan Coque" <ryan.coque@gmail.com> wrote in message news:Xns95FA9A4436A0ERyancoquegmailcom@216.168.3.4 4... > http://www.thetoque.com/041019/web_browser.htm > It's funny, I've never had a problem with IE and I use it most of the day every day. Perhaps it's user error? |
Re: Another reason NOT to use Internet Explorer
Ryan Coque wrote:
> http://www.thetoque.com/041019/web_browser.htm > > I love the last line. Ironically, Mozilla is not the answer - lynx is, at least it is not based on Gecko. |
Re: Another reason NOT to use Internet Explorer
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:28:01 +1100, "Uncle Bully"
<wakeupcall@optushome.com.au.REMOVE> wrote: > >"Ryan Coque" <ryan.coque@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:Xns95FA9A4436A0ERyancoquegmailcom@216.168.3. 44... >> http://www.thetoque.com/041019/web_browser.htm >> > >It's funny, I've never had a problem with IE and I use it most of the day >every day. Perhaps it's user error? > Hello Mr Microsoft employee Internet Explorer doesn't even comply with the standards. You can write a website exactly fitting the standards and it won't display correctly in IE. Had to laugh at Microsoft who created this example site which they said was 100% standard compliant and displayed correctly in IE, but not in Mozilla. Microsoft was half right, it was 100% standard compliant, but Mozilla displayed it correctly, IE didn't. |
Re: Another reason NOT to use Internet Explorer
Ryan Coque wrote:
> http://www.thetoque.com/041019/web_browser.htm > > I love the last line. that story is a load of crap... quote "Now the program takes a minute to load because you've installed every "useful" application," I have not installed any "usefull" applications and my ie runs just fine. Oh and btw, if you think your safe using mozilla and co, think again. -- DalienX |
Re: Another reason NOT to use Internet Explorer
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 05:46:02 GMT, "DalienX" <somewhere@earth.com>
wrote: >Ryan Coque wrote: > >> http://www.thetoque.com/041019/web_browser.htm >> >> I love the last line. > >that story is a load of crap... > >quote "Now the program takes a minute to load because you've installed >every "useful" application," >I have not installed any "usefull" applications and my ie runs just >fine. >Oh and btw, if you think your safe using mozilla and co, think again. You are using Mozilla, unless you're a moron. |
Re: Another reason NOT to use Internet Explorer
Brissie wrote:
> > You are using Mozilla, unless you're a moron. Internet explorer was made by professionals with a budget of millions mozilla was made by some 10 year old with no budget, the only reason mozilla is not already full of spyware is nobody has bothered to make any for it yet, but don't worry thats all changing. Mozillas popularity is such that very soon it will be so chock full of spyware i dowbt it will even start. -- DalienX |
Re: Another reason NOT to use Internet Explorer
DalienX wrote:
> > that story is a load of crap... > Well der! You did read the sites tag line at the top of the page? "CANADA'S SOURCE FOR INTERNET HUMOUR, PARODY, AND SATIRE" |
Re: Another reason NOT to use Internet Explorer
Stephen Brooker wrote:
> DalienX wrote: > > > > that story is a load of crap... > > > > Well der! You did read the sites tag line at the top of the page? > > "CANADA'S SOURCE FOR INTERNET HUMOUR, PARODY, AND SATIRE" hahah uh no, i didnt read that bit.... oops -- DalienX |
Re: Another reason NOT to use Internet Explorer
DalienX wrote:
> Brissie wrote: > > >> >> You are using Mozilla, unless you're a moron. > > Internet explorer was made by professionals with a budget of millions > > mozilla was made by some 10 year old with no budget.... Grow up! Money means absolutely nothing. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 02:36 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.