![]() |
Market Share of Computer Languages
Someone recently told me that 60% of the code currently in use, is
written in java. I have to wonder to myself, "is this information good? how old is this information? Does 'code' really only apply to a particular category of code?" and so on. I knew java had become very popular for mobile devices, but 60% of all code in use seems surprising. Does any sort of official (hopefully impartial) body actually keep track of this? |
Re: Market Share of Computer Languages
On Feb 6, 12:55 pm, "Aaron" <odysseus...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Someone recently told me that 60% of the code currently in use, is > written in java. I have to wonder to myself, "is this information > good? how old is this information? Does 'code' really only apply to a > particular category of code?" and so on. I knew java had become very > popular for mobile devices, but 60% of all code in use seems > surprising. Does any sort of official (hopefully impartial) body > actually keep track of this? 60% seems awefully high to me. Perhaps that was 60% of all new code written? There is probably a far larger amount of "legacy" code that is written in C/C++/COBOL/etc.. than in Java. I don't know any statistics myself, though. |
Re: Market Share of Computer Languages
On Feb 6, 3:59 pm, "Daniel Pitts" <googlegrou...@coloraura.com> wrote:
> On Feb 6, 12:55 pm, "Aaron" <odysseus...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > Someone recently told me that 60% of the code currently in use, is > > written in java. I have to wonder to myself, "is this information > > good? how old is this information? Does 'code' really only apply to a > > particular category of code?" and so on. I knew java had become very > > popular for mobile devices, but 60% of all code in use seems > > surprising. Does any sort of official (hopefully impartial) body > > actually keep track of this? > > 60% seems awefully high to me. Perhaps that was 60% of all new code > written? > There is probably a far larger amount of "legacy" code that is written > in C/C++/COBOL/etc.. than in Java. > > I don't know any statistics myself, though. I thought the same thing myself. Then again, those older langauges had already passed their apex by the time the Internet really got cooking. I got the impression that the "fact" (urban lengend?) did apply to any legacy code so long as the software was still in active use. Another useful question would be what are the fastest growing languages? |
Re: Market Share of Computer Languages
Aaron wrote:
> On Feb 6, 3:59 pm, "Daniel Pitts" <googlegrou...@coloraura.com> wrote: >> 60% seems awefully high to me. Perhaps that was 60% of all new code >> written? >> There is probably a far larger amount of "legacy" code that is written >> in C/C++/COBOL/etc.. than in Java. >> >> I don't know any statistics myself, though. > > I thought the same thing myself. Then again, those older langauges > had already passed their apex by the time the Internet really got > cooking. I got the impression that the "fact" (urban lengend?) did > apply to any legacy code so long as the software was still in active > use. > > Another useful question would be what are the fastest growing > languages? Code tend to exist for decades. There are still a lot of COBOL, FORTRAN and PL/I out there. C/C++ may not be first choice for new development, but there are still a lot of code out there and I don't think much has been retired yet. I have no doubt that Java is the biggest language for new development. Just check the job sites for verification. The fastest growing language is probably C#. Arne |
Re: Market Share of Computer Languages
Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> > There are still a lot of COBOL, FORTRAN and PL/I out there. > And while it may seem obsolete, COBOL is still one of the top business languages used. The shop I work in converted scads of COBOL code from a mainframe over to Unix and it's still supported, enhanced and maintained for the simple reason that it does what it is supposed to do well. It may not be elegant or pretty, but for someone who is old-school like me, there's nothing better to look at (within IT) than an well structured Cobol program..even one that is 5000 lines. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 04:44 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.