![]() |
[OT] Good C++ book for a Python programmer
I'm picking up C++ again after years of using almost nothing but
Python. I'm frankly enjoying the experience, and it's certainly deepening my appreciation of Python (which you can read however you like). I was wondering whether anyone could recommend a good C++ book, with "good" being defined from the perspective of a Python programmer. I realize that there isn't a book titled "C++ for Python Programmers", but has anyone found one that they think goes particularly well with the Python way? I'm asking this because evidently the C++ standard has changed a bit since 1994, when I bought my books. Who knew that fstream was deprecated? Thanks in advance... |
Re: [OT] Good C++ book for a Python programmer
Rick Muller wrote:
>I was wondering whether anyone could recommend a good C++ book, with >"good" being defined from the perspective of a Python programmer. The STL and the template feature of C++ gives the programmer some of the functionality of Python (using templates instead of duck typing, vectors instead of lists etc.), so a book that introduces these features early, such as "Accelerated C++" by Koenig and Moo, could be a good start for a Pythonner. The 4th edition of the well-known "C++ Primer", with Moo as a new co-author, will soon be published. It is a more comprehensive and much longer book. |
Re: [OT] Good C++ book for a Python programmer
<rick_muller@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1106136496.719185.87850@c13g2000cwb.googlegro ups.com... > I'm picking up C++ again after years of using almost nothing but > Python. I'm frankly enjoying the experience, and it's certainly > deepening my appreciation of Python (which you can read however you > like). > Gad! After Python, how can you stand it (C++) ? Adding object oriented utility to the C language was an atrocity, albeit perhaps a necessary one given the state of the art when that particular atrocity was committed. Aren't we past this? If it is fast, fully compiled code you seek - couldn't you just C a few slow functions and use them in your Python? Thomas Bartkus |
Re: [OT] Good C++ book for a Python programmer
"rick_muller@yahoo.com" <rick_muller@yahoo.com> writes:
> I was wondering whether anyone could recommend a good C++ book, with > "good" being defined from the perspective of a Python programmer. I > realize that there isn't a book titled "C++ for Python Programmers", > but has anyone found one that they think goes particularly well with > the Python way? I think it's not possible to really grok C++ without having worked on large multi-person C projects and understood what problems C++ tried to solve. The only good book I know about C++ is by Stroustrup, "The C++ Programming Language" or something like that; it's not an easy book though. |
Re: [OT] Good C++ book for a Python programmer
I suggest you google 'C++ tutorial'
Regards, Philippe On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 04:08:16 -0800, rick_muller@yahoo.com wrote: > I'm picking up C++ again after years of using almost nothing but > Python. I'm frankly enjoying the experience, and it's certainly > deepening my appreciation of Python (which you can read however you > like). > > I was wondering whether anyone could recommend a good C++ book, with > "good" being defined from the perspective of a Python programmer. I > realize that there isn't a book titled "C++ for Python Programmers", > but has anyone found one that they think goes particularly well with > the Python way? > > I'm asking this because evidently the C++ standard has changed a bit > since 1994, when I bought my books. Who knew that fstream was > deprecated? > > Thanks in advance... |
Re: [OT] Good C++ book for a Python programmer
<beliavsky@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1106151297.339844.95380@c13g2000cwb.googlegro ups.com... > The 4th edition of the well-known "C++ Primer", with Moo as a new > co-author, will soon be published. It is a > more comprehensive and much longer book. It is also organized more traditionally than "Accelerated C++." "Accelerated C++" is mostly example-driven: It presents problems, shows how to solve them, and introduces language and library features as needed for particular parts of the solutions. Of course the problems are carefully chosen so that the solutions cover the most important parts of the language and library, but that fact is not immediately obvious from the nature of the problems themselves. "C++ Primer" follows the classical approach of treating each part of the language and library separately in a single place. For example, there are chapters on expressions, statements, functions, templates, object-oriented programming, and so on. It is also much more systematic than "Accelerated C++." It is also nearly three times the size. Which of these books you prefer will depend on your learning style more than anything else. If you are willing to read the entire book sequentially, you will probably learn C++ faster from "Accelerated C++" than from "C++ Primer." On the other hand, if you want to see in one place what all the different kinds of statements are, so that you can learn about them all at once, then you will be more comfortable with "C++ Primer." I'm biased, of course, but I believe that either of these books is a better starting point for someone unfamiliar with C than any other book I can think of. |
Re: [OT] Good C++ book for a Python programmer
>>>>> "Philippe" == Philippe C Martin <philippe@philippecmartin.com> writes:
Philippe> I suggest you google 'C++ tutorial' Regards, Stroustup's "The C++ Programming Language" is the best C++ book I've read. It is at a fairly high level, and I already had read several C++ books before reading it, so it may be tough sledding. But I would try this first since you are an experienced programmer and know OO concepts, and if it fails to satisfy try something lighter. Unfortunately, I didn't like any of the other kinder, gentler overview books I read on C++, so can't really recommend anything along those lines, though I'm sure they are out there. JDH |
Re: [OT] Good C++ book for a Python programmer
John Hunter wrote:
>>>>>>"Philippe" == Philippe C Martin <philippe@philippecmartin.com> writes: > > > Philippe> I suggest you google 'C++ tutorial' Regards, > > Stroustup's "The C++ Programming Language" is the best C++ book I've > read. It is at a fairly high level, and I already had read several > C++ books before reading it, so it may be tough sledding. But I would > try this first since you are an experienced programmer and know OO > concepts, and if it fails to satisfy try something lighter. > Unfortunately, I didn't like any of the other kinder, gentler overview > books I read on C++, so can't really recommend anything along those > lines, though I'm sure they are out there. > > JDH For a rationale as to why the language developed the way it did, you can read Stroustrup's "The Design and Evolution of C++". This is no good for learning the language, but it might be a good library borrow to find out why the language is the way it is. -Scott David Daniels Scott.Daniels@Acm.Org |
Re: [OT] Good C++ book for a Python programmer
On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 09:04 -0800, beliavsky@aol.com wrote:
> Rick Muller wrote: > >I was wondering whether anyone could recommend a good C++ book, with > >"good" being defined from the perspective of a Python programmer. > > The STL and the template feature of C++ gives the programmer some of > the functionality of Python (using templates instead of duck typing, > vectors instead of lists etc.), I'm particularly fond of internally refcounted objects (as used extensively in Qt) and of guarded pointers, myself. The use of these two things means one can avoid the "sometimes works, sometimes doesn't" fun of referencing deleted memory by accident. -- Craig Ringer |
Re: [OT] Good C++ book for a Python programmer
>>>>> "Rick" == rick muller@yahoo com <rick_muller@yahoo.com> writes:
Rick> I was wondering whether anyone could recommend a good C++ Rick> book, with "good" being defined from the perspective of a Rick> Python programmer. I A good C++ book from the perspective of a Python programmer would be one proclaiming that C++ is deprecated as a language, and it has become illegal to develop software with it. Rick> realize that there isn't a book titled "C++ for Python Rick> Programmers", but has anyone found one that they think goes Rick> particularly well with the Python way? I don't think that's possible, considering the nature of the language. Templates are closest to the Python way as far as C++ technologies go, but they are very unpythonic in their complexity. Rick> I'm asking this because evidently the C++ standard has Rick> changed a bit since 1994, when I bought my books. Who knew Rick> that fstream was deprecated? Stroustrup book, already mentioned by others, is the one if you just need a "refresh" your knowledge. "Effective C++" and "More effective C++" are also great to learn about all the nasty gotchas that your Python experience might make you neglect. They are also certain to deepen your appreciation of Python ;-). -- Ville Vainio http://tinyurl.com/2prnb |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 08:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.