Rationale behind requiring ampersand and fully qualified name to form a member function pointer
I hope Mr. Stroustrup can give an answer to this question:
What was rationale behind the requirements to use an ampersand and a fully
qualified name of a function, to form a pointer to a member function? Is
there any syntax ambiguity without those? MS C++ compiler is quite happy
when a plain function name is used (I haven't tried it in ANSI compliance
mode, though), so for long time I've been pretty sure that it's OK...
|All times are GMT. The time now is 10:50 PM.|
Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.