|
MEDIA censorship and propaganda inthe US
How is it that more than 40 percent of Americans still believe Iraq has
weapons of mass destruction even though President Bush personally has admitted there are none? How is it possible that millions of Americans believe the recent election in Iraq showed that Iraqis are in favor of the ongoing occupation of their country? In reality, the determination displayed by the roughly 59 percent of registered voters who participated in the election did so because they felt it would bring about an end to the U.S. occupation. How do so many Americans wonder why more Iraqis each day are supporting both violent and non-violent movements of resistance to the occupation when after the U.S. government promised to help rebuild Iraq, a mere 2 percent of reconstruction contracts were awarded to Iraqi concerns and the infrastructure lies in shambles? It's because overall, mainstream media reportage in the United States about the occupation in Iraq is being censured, distorted, threatened by the military and controlled by corporations that own the outlets. Recently at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Eason Jordan, a CNN executive, told a panel that the U.S. military deliberately targeted journalists in Iraq. He said he "knew of about 12 journalists who had not only been killed by American troops, but had been targeted as a matter of policy," said Rep. Barney Frank, a Democrat from Massachusetts who was on the panel with Jordan. When we hear this statement with the knowledge that 63 journalists have been killed in Iraq, in addition to the fact that in a 14-month-period, more journalists were killed in Iraq than during the entire Vietnam War, one begins to get the feeling that the military clampdown on the media is more than a myth or a conspiracy theory. (Editor's note: Jordan has since resigned from CNN, telling fellow CNN staffers: "I never meant to imply U.S. forces acted with ill intent when U.S. forces accidentally killed journalists, and I apologize to anyone who thought I said or believed otherwise.") I've personally witnessed photographers in Baghdad who have had their cameras either confiscated or smashed by soldiers, who were, of course, acting on orders from their superiors. And no, the journalists weren't trying to photograph something that would jeopardize the security of the soldiers. Even Christiane Amanpour, CNN's top war correspondent, announced on national television that her own network was censuring her journalism. Most Americans don't know that on any given day, an average of three U.S. soldiers die in Iraq as a result of 75 attacks every single day on U.S. forces or that Iraqi civilian deaths average 10 times that amount. Most Americans also don't know there are four permanent U.S. military bases in Iraq, with the Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg Brown and Root diligently constructing 10 others. Most Americans don't know overall troop morale in Iraq resembles that of the Vietnam War, with tours being extended and stop-loss orders imposed. Nor do most folks know where billions of their tax dollars have been spent that were supposed to be used in the reconstruction of Iraq. But who can blame Americans when the military and mainstream media continue, day in and day out, to distort, deny and destroy the truth before it reaches the audience back home? An international peoples' initiative called the World Tribunal on Iraq met in Rome to focus on media complicity in the crimes committed against the people of Iraq as well as U.S. citizens who are paying with their blood and tax dollars to maintain the occupation. The tribunal found Western mainstream media outlets guilty of incitement to violence and the deliberate misleading of people into the war and ongoing occupation of Iraq. Makes you wonder what else Americans aren't being told about Iraq. After spending eight of the past 14 months reporting fromIraq, I can tell you the points made here are just the tip of the iceberg. |
PROOF THAT LIBERALS HATE MANKIND ==> MEDIA censorship and propaganda inthe US
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:34:19 +1300, "JA" <jasmineaa@yahoo.om> wrote:
>How is it that more than 40 percent of Americans still believe Iraq has >weapons of mass destruction even though President Bush personally has >admitted there are none? > >How is it possible that millions of Americans believe the recent election in >Iraq showed that Iraqis are in favor of the ongoing occupation of their >country? In reality, the determination displayed by the roughly 59 percent >of registered voters who participated in the election did so because they >felt it would bring about an end to the U.S. occupation. > >How do so many Americans wonder why more Iraqis each day are supporting both >violent and non-violent movements of resistance to the occupation when after >the U.S. government promised to help rebuild Iraq, a mere 2 percent of >reconstruction contracts were awarded to Iraqi concerns and the >infrastructure lies in shambles? > >It's because overall, mainstream media reportage in the United States about >the occupation in Iraq is being censured, distorted, threatened by the >military and controlled by corporations that own the outlets. > >Recently at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Eason Jordan, a >CNN executive, told a panel that the U.S. military deliberately targeted >journalists in Iraq. He said he "knew of about 12 journalists who had not >only been killed by American troops, but had been targeted as a matter of >policy," said Rep. Barney Frank, a Democrat from Massachusetts who was on >the panel with Jordan. > >When we hear this statement with the knowledge that 63 journalists have been >killed in Iraq, in addition to the fact that in a 14-month-period, more >journalists were killed in Iraq than during the entire Vietnam War, one >begins to get the feeling that the military clampdown on the media is more >than a myth or a conspiracy theory. > >(Editor's note: Jordan has since resigned from CNN, telling fellow CNN >staffers: "I never meant to imply U.S. forces acted with ill intent when >U.S. forces accidentally killed journalists, and I apologize to anyone who >thought I said or believed otherwise.") > >I've personally witnessed photographers in Baghdad who have had their >cameras either confiscated or smashed by soldiers, who were, of course, >acting on orders from their superiors. And no, the journalists weren't >trying to photograph something that would jeopardize the security of the >soldiers. > >Even Christiane Amanpour, CNN's top war correspondent, announced on national >television that her own network was censuring her journalism. > >Most Americans don't know that on any given day, an average of three U.S. >soldiers die in Iraq as a result of 75 attacks every single day on U.S. >forces or that Iraqi civilian deaths average 10 times that amount. > >Most Americans also don't know there are four permanent U.S. military bases >in Iraq, with the Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg Brown and Root diligently >constructing 10 others. > >Most Americans don't know overall troop morale in Iraq resembles that of the >Vietnam War, with tours being extended and stop-loss orders imposed. > >Nor do most folks know where billions of their tax dollars have been spent >that were supposed to be used in the reconstruction of Iraq. > >But who can blame Americans when the military and mainstream media continue, >day in and day out, to distort, deny and destroy the truth before it reaches >the audience back home? An international peoples' initiative called the >World Tribunal on Iraq met in Rome to focus on media complicity in the >crimes committed against the people of Iraq as well as U.S. citizens who are >paying with their blood and tax dollars to maintain the occupation. The >tribunal found Western mainstream media outlets guilty of incitement to >violence and the deliberate misleading of people into the war and ongoing >occupation of Iraq. > >Makes you wonder what else Americans aren't being told about Iraq. After >spending eight of the past 14 months reporting fromIraq, I can tell you the >points made here are just the tip of the iceberg. > > |
Re: MEDIA censorship and propaganda inthe US
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:34:19 +1300, "JA" <jasmineaa@yahoo.om> wrote:
>How is it that more than 40 percent of Americans still believe Iraq has >weapons of mass destruction even though President Bush personally has >admitted there are none? __________________________________________________ _________ How is it possible someone could post this question to a DVD discussion group? Are they dumber than Bush? -- BT |
Re: PROOF THAT LIBERALS HATE MANKIND - A peculiar sense of facts
Gonna have to explain further for this liberal boy. What is the analysis
behind the argument that 'liberals hate mankind'? I always thought it was the right and fascists who are indifferent to people, and this is spelled out through wars, oppression, and supreme arrogance by republicans over the past 3 or so years. "Brenda White" <bwhite@N0SPAM.C0M> wrote in message news:1109061737.a10deda76d51f111249e85662bf334b2@m eganetnews2... > On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:34:19 +1300, "JA" <jasmineaa@yahoo.om> wrote: > >>How is it that more than 40 percent of Americans still believe Iraq has >>weapons of mass destruction even though President Bush personally has >>admitted there are none? >> >>How is it possible that millions of Americans believe the recent election >>in >>Iraq showed that Iraqis are in favor of the ongoing occupation of their >>country? In reality, the determination displayed by the roughly 59 percent >>of registered voters who participated in the election did so because they >>felt it would bring about an end to the U.S. occupation. >> >>How do so many Americans wonder why more Iraqis each day are supporting >>both >>violent and non-violent movements of resistance to the occupation when >>after >>the U.S. government promised to help rebuild Iraq, a mere 2 percent of >>reconstruction contracts were awarded to Iraqi concerns and the >>infrastructure lies in shambles? >> >>It's because overall, mainstream media reportage in the United States >>about >>the occupation in Iraq is being censured, distorted, threatened by the >>military and controlled by corporations that own the outlets. >> >>Recently at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Eason Jordan, >>a >>CNN executive, told a panel that the U.S. military deliberately targeted >>journalists in Iraq. He said he "knew of about 12 journalists who had not >>only been killed by American troops, but had been targeted as a matter of >>policy," said Rep. Barney Frank, a Democrat from Massachusetts who was on >>the panel with Jordan. >> >>When we hear this statement with the knowledge that 63 journalists have >>been >>killed in Iraq, in addition to the fact that in a 14-month-period, more >>journalists were killed in Iraq than during the entire Vietnam War, one >>begins to get the feeling that the military clampdown on the media is more >>than a myth or a conspiracy theory. >> >>(Editor's note: Jordan has since resigned from CNN, telling fellow CNN >>staffers: "I never meant to imply U.S. forces acted with ill intent when >>U.S. forces accidentally killed journalists, and I apologize to anyone who >>thought I said or believed otherwise.") >> >>I've personally witnessed photographers in Baghdad who have had their >>cameras either confiscated or smashed by soldiers, who were, of course, >>acting on orders from their superiors. And no, the journalists weren't >>trying to photograph something that would jeopardize the security of the >>soldiers. >> >>Even Christiane Amanpour, CNN's top war correspondent, announced on >>national >>television that her own network was censuring her journalism. >> >>Most Americans don't know that on any given day, an average of three U.S. >>soldiers die in Iraq as a result of 75 attacks every single day on U.S. >>forces or that Iraqi civilian deaths average 10 times that amount. >> >>Most Americans also don't know there are four permanent U.S. military >>bases >>in Iraq, with the Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg Brown and Root diligently >>constructing 10 others. >> >>Most Americans don't know overall troop morale in Iraq resembles that of >>the >>Vietnam War, with tours being extended and stop-loss orders imposed. >> >>Nor do most folks know where billions of their tax dollars have been spent >>that were supposed to be used in the reconstruction of Iraq. >> >>But who can blame Americans when the military and mainstream media >>continue, >>day in and day out, to distort, deny and destroy the truth before it >>reaches >>the audience back home? An international peoples' initiative called the >>World Tribunal on Iraq met in Rome to focus on media complicity in the >>crimes committed against the people of Iraq as well as U.S. citizens who >>are >>paying with their blood and tax dollars to maintain the occupation. The >>tribunal found Western mainstream media outlets guilty of incitement to >>violence and the deliberate misleading of people into the war and ongoing >>occupation of Iraq. >> >>Makes you wonder what else Americans aren't being told about Iraq. After >>spending eight of the past 14 months reporting fromIraq, I can tell you >>the >>points made here are just the tip of the iceberg. >> >> > |
Re: PROOF THAT LIBERALS HATE MANKIND - A peculiar sense of facts
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:12:53 +0000 (UTC), "Alex Smith"
<alastairmcgowan@btopenworld.com> wrote: >Gonna have to explain further for this liberal boy. What is the analysis >behind the argument that 'liberals hate mankind'? I always thought it was >the right and fascists who are indifferent to people, and this is spelled >out through wars, oppression, and supreme arrogance by republicans over the >past 3 or so years. Nah. There has been a concerted history revision exercise whereby Nazism and fascism is to be regarded as a leftwing/liberal creed. The exercise has been remarkably successful with a significant number of the dumber and more hate-filled neocons. |
Re: MEDIA censorship and propaganda inthe US
Bill Turner posted:
> How is it possible someone could post this question to a DVD discussion > group? Are they dumber than Bush? there is a popular DVD out there on the matter. -- misinformation rules. |
Re: MEDIA censorship and propaganda inthe US
"JA" wrote in alt.video.dvd:
>How is it that more than 40 percent of Americans still believe Iraq has >weapons of mass destruction even though President Bush personally has >admitted there are none? How is it that morons keep posting politics to alt.video.dvd? (followups redirected) -- Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA http://OakRoadSystems.com/ DVD FAQ: http://dvddemystified.com/dvdfaq.html other FAQs: http://oakroadsystems.com/genl/faqget.htm |
Re: MEDIA censorship and propaganda in the US ...PROOF ...THAT "Brenda White" IS A NUTCASE==>
"Brenda White" <bwhite@N0SPAM.C0M> wrote in message news:1109061737.a10deda76d51f111249e85662bf334b2@m eganetnews2... > On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:34:19 +1300, "JA" <jasmineaa@yahoo.om> wrote: How is it that more than 40 percent of Americans still believe Iraq has weapons of mass destruction even though President Bush personally has admitted there are none? How is it possible that millions of Americans believe the recent election in Iraq showed that Iraqis are in favor of the ongoing occupation of their country? In reality, the determination displayed by the roughly 59 percent of registered voters who participated in the election did so because they felt it would bring about an end to the U.S. occupation. How do so many Americans wonder why more Iraqis each day are supporting both violent and non-violent movements of resistance to the occupation when after the U.S. government promised to help rebuild Iraq, a mere 2 percent of reconstruction contracts were awarded to Iraqi concerns and the infrastructure lies in shambles? It's because overall, mainstream media reportage in the United States about the occupation in Iraq is being censured, distorted, threatened by the military and controlled by corporations that own the outlets. Recently at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Eason Jordan, a CNN executive, told a panel that the U.S. military deliberately targeted journalists in Iraq. He said he "knew of about 12 journalists who had not only been killed by American troops, but had been targeted as a matter of policy," said Rep. Barney Frank, a Democrat from Massachusetts who was on the panel with Jordan. When we hear this statement with the knowledge that 63 journalists have been killed in Iraq, in addition to the fact that in a 14-month-period, more journalists were killed in Iraq than during the entire Vietnam War, one begins to get the feeling that the military clampdown on the media is more than a myth or a conspiracy theory. (Editor's note: Jordan has since resigned from CNN, telling fellow CNN staffers: "I never meant to imply U.S. forces acted with ill intent when U.S. forces accidentally killed journalists, and I apologize to anyone who thought I said or believed otherwise.") I've personally witnessed photographers in Baghdad who have had their cameras either confiscated or smashed by soldiers, who were, of course, acting on orders from their superiors. And no, the journalists weren't trying to photograph something that would jeopardize the security of the soldiers. Even Christiane Amanpour, CNN's top war correspondent, announced on national television that her own network was censuring her journalism. Most Americans don't know that on any given day, an average of three U.S. soldiers die in Iraq as a result of 75 attacks every single day on U.S. forces or that Iraqi civilian deaths average 10 times that amount. Most Americans also don't know there are four permanent U.S. military bases in Iraq, with the Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg Brown and Root diligently constructing 10 others. Most Americans don't know overall troop morale in Iraq resembles that of the Vietnam War, with tours being extended and stop-loss orders imposed. Nor do most folks know where billions of their tax dollars have been spent that were supposed to be used in the reconstruction of Iraq. But who can blame Americans when the military and mainstream media continue, day in and day out, to distort, deny and destroy the truth before it reaches the audience back home? An international peoples' initiative called the World Tribunal on Iraq met in Rome to focus on media complicity in the crimes committed against the people of Iraq as well as U.S. citizens who are paying with their blood and tax dollars to maintain the occupation. The tribunal found Western mainstream media outlets guilty of incitement to violence and the deliberate misleading of people into the war and ongoing occupation of Iraq. Makes you wonder what else Americans aren't being told about Iraq. After spending eight of the past 14 months reporting fromIraq, I can tell you the points made here are just the tip of the iceberg. |
Re: MEDIA censorship and propaganda inthe US -DVD's
"Bill Turner" <noway@nohow.com> wrote in message news:4l1m11tvt8biiu8crfgfs3otjhlvrhkmta@4ax.com... > On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:34:19 +1300, "JA" <jasmineaa@yahoo.om> wrote: > >>How is it that more than 40 percent of Americans still believe Iraq has >>weapons of mass destruction even though President Bush personally has >>admitted there are none? > __________________________________________________ _________ > > How is it possible someone could post this question to a DVD discussion > group? Because there are many DVD's on this subject: Control Room http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/AS...616979-1763957 Uncovered - The Whole Truth About the Iraq War (2003) http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...63957?v=glance Outfoxed - Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...nce&s=dvd&st=* The Corporation (2004) http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...v=glance&s=dvd Fahrenheit 9/11 (2004) http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...v=glance&s=dvd and one of the best: Manufacturing Consent - Noam Chomsky and the Media (1993)http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...v=glance&s=dvd and coming soon! Noam Chomsky:Rebel Without a Pause http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...v=glance&s=dvd >Are they dumber than Bush? No. Few are. > > -- > BT > > > |
Re: MEDIA censorship and propaganda inthe US
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:34:19 +1300, "JA" <jasmineaa@yahoo.om> wrote:
>How is it that more than 40 percent of Americans still believe Iraq has >weapons of mass destruction even though President Bush personally has >admitted there are none? That's absolutely right. They moved them all to Syria prior to the U.S. invasion. -Rich |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 02:52 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.