Velocity Reviews

Velocity Reviews (http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/index.php)
-   Digital Photography (http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/f37-digital-photography.html)
-   -   10D simple test (http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/t239046-10d-simple-test.html)

Tomash Bednarz 07-22-2003 02:09 AM

10D simple test
 
Canon 50mm 1.8 vs Tamron 28-300mm
http://trans2.cm.kyushu-u.ac.jp/fotk...-vs-28300mmXR/

Canon 50mm 1.8 vs Canon 28-135mm IS:
http://trans2.cm.kyushu-u.ac.jp/fotk...mm-vs-28135mm/




Mark M 07-22-2003 03:10 AM

Re: 10D simple test
 

"Tomash Bednarz" <warloque@poczta.one.pl> wrote in message
news:bfi6d1$qa4$1@news.onet.pl...
> Canon 50mm 1.8 vs Tamron 28-300mm
>

http://trans2.cm.kyushu-u.ac.jp/fotk...-vs-28300mmXR/
>
> Canon 50mm 1.8 vs Canon 28-135mm IS:
>

http://trans2.cm.kyushu-u.ac.jp/fotk...mm-vs-28135mm/

It would help if you shot at the highest resolution setting.



David 07-22-2003 03:29 AM

Re: 10D simple test
 
http://trans2.cm.kyushu-u.ac.jp/fotk...amera-damiana/ if
this is a hotel room in Japan you can keep it. Hello Ritz Carlton




Rafe B. 07-22-2003 03:34 AM

Re: 10D simple test
 
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 20:10:28 -0700, "Mark M" <mjmorgan2@cox.net>
wrote:


>It would help if you shot at the highest resolution setting.



What are you talking about? The images are 3072 x 2048.
As I understand it, that's a 6 Mpixel image.

Maybe you're not ready for a 10D?


rafe b.
http://www.terrapinphoto.com

Mark M 07-22-2003 03:38 AM

Re: 10D simple test
 

"Rafe B." <rafe.bustin@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:tbcphv4gtcmf99fd053kl4q9u96cnnn2q6@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 20:10:28 -0700, "Mark M" <mjmorgan2@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
>
> >It would help if you shot at the highest resolution setting.

>
>
> What are you talking about? The images are 3072 x 2048.
> As I understand it, that's a 6 Mpixel image.
>
> Maybe you're not ready for a 10D?


My 10D works just fine, thanks.
As to your comments...
-Check it Bub...
The pics posted are 2048x1360.
Maybe he's using a "10D Jr.?"





Rafe B. 07-22-2003 03:40 AM

Re: 10D simple test
 
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 20:10:28 -0700, "Mark M" <mjmorgan2@cox.net>
wrote:

>
>"Tomash Bednarz" <warloque@poczta.one.pl> wrote in message
>news:bfi6d1$qa4$1@news.onet.pl...
>> Canon 50mm 1.8 vs Tamron 28-300mm
>>

>http://trans2.cm.kyushu-u.ac.jp/fotk...-vs-28300mmXR/
>>
>> Canon 50mm 1.8 vs Canon 28-135mm IS:
>>

>http://trans2.cm.kyushu-u.ac.jp/fotk...mm-vs-28135mm/
>
>It would help if you shot at the highest resolution setting.



My apologies, Mark The two pix at the first link are full-res.
Those at the 2nd link are not.


rafe b.
http://www.terrapinphoto.com

Lionel 07-22-2003 03:41 AM

Re: 10D simple test
 
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 20:38:59 -0700, in <Fl2Ta.13748$Bp2.577@fed1read07>,
"Mark M" <mjmorgan2@cox.net> said:

>My 10D works just fine, thanks.
>As to your comments...
>-Check it Bub...
>The pics posted are 2048x1360.
>Maybe he's using a "10D Jr.?"


Eh? - I think there's something the matter with your browser. I've got
<http://trans2.cm.kyushu-u.ac.jp/fotki/warlock/eos/21.7.03e-50mm-vs-28300mmXR/canon50.JPG>
open in front of me right now, & Opera 7.0 reports that it is indeed
3072x2048, which is exactly what my eyes are are telling me, as well. ;)

--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------

Mark M 07-22-2003 03:43 AM

Re: 10D simple test
 
> >It would help if you shot at the highest resolution setting.
>
>
> My apologies, Mark The two pix at the first link are full-res.
> Those at the 2nd link are not.


That's OK.
You missed the second set, and it looks like I missed the first set.
I'm not sure why he chose to do each differently...
If he wants to save space, then a full-res crop would work too.



Tomash Bednarz 07-22-2003 04:07 AM

Re: 10D simple test
 
thanks for any signals :)

sorry for lower resolution in the second link
anyway u can see the differences :P i hope as an example, so do not be angry
i will do it again :) my fault :P

u can also see nigt shot taken from my apartement just as a test also:
http://trans2.cm.kyushu-u.ac.jp/fotk...y/104_0457.JPG

best regards to all of u
Tomash





"Tomash Bednarz" <warloque@poczta.one.pl> wrote in message
news:bfi6d1$qa4$1@news.onet.pl...
> Canon 50mm 1.8 vs Tamron 28-300mm
>

http://trans2.cm.kyushu-u.ac.jp/fotk...-vs-28300mmXR/
>
> Canon 50mm 1.8 vs Canon 28-135mm IS:
>

http://trans2.cm.kyushu-u.ac.jp/fotk...mm-vs-28135mm/
>
>
>




Todd Walker 07-22-2003 06:27 AM

Re: 10D simple test
 
In article <bfi6d1$qa4$1@news.onet.pl>, warloque@poczta.one.pl says...
> Canon 50mm 1.8 vs Tamron 28-300mm
> http://trans2.cm.kyushu-u.ac.jp/fotk...-vs-28300mmXR/
>
> Canon 50mm 1.8 vs Canon 28-135mm IS:
> http://trans2.cm.kyushu-u.ac.jp/fotk...mm-vs-28135mm/


Great stuff. Thanks for posting these. I am about to order a 10D with
the 50mm 1.8 and the 28-135IS USM so these were perfect comparisons for
me. I am shocked at the difference in quality between the Canon 50 and
the Tamron 28-300. All of the camera magazines are raving about the
Tamron lens and compared to the Canon 50 it looks pretty bad. Of course
you are comparing a 10x zoom to a prime so I guess if you take that into
account, it's not too bad but the difference is quite significant.

--
________________________________
Todd Walker
http://twalker.d2g.com
Olympus E20
Canon G2
My Digital Photography Weblog:
http://twalker.d2g.com/dpblog.htm
_________________________________


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.