Velocity Reviews

Velocity Reviews (http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/index.php)
-   Digital Photography (http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/f37-digital-photography.html)
-   -   Re: 98 vs. XP for digital photography (http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/t238080-re-98-vs-xp-for-digital-photography.html)

Ron Hunter 07-10-2003 02:57 PM

Re: 98 vs. XP for digital photography
 
Alfred Molon wrote:

> In article <Xns93B3BEE2CA8C7nntprogerscom@140.99.99.130>,
> REMOVEnntp@rogers.com says...
>
>>>I
>>>read somewhere that XP is a memory hog, occupying up to half a GB.
>>>

>>
>>XP uses more memory than 98, but the added stability and features (Power
>>Saving, NTFS, etc) are well worth it.

>
>
> Stability isn't that much of an issue. What I'd like to have is raw
> speed. Looks like I'll have to add extra memory quite soon.


If you want raw speed, spend your money on more ram and a faster
processor and faster disk. The OS won't make that much difference, but
the twentieth time you crash on 98SE while my XP machine rattles on
reliably you might notice a bit of difference in throughput.




All times are GMT. The time now is 09:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.