Re: in-camera charging
 

C3 wrote:

> What about downloading the photos through the camera (rather than a
> dedicated card reader)? I don't want to lay out the cash for a card reader,
> even if it does end up being a bit faster.
>
> Do CF cards support close to the full bandwidth of USB1?
>
>
> "Joseph Meehan" <sligojoeSPAM2@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:HO9Pa.16568$xv.5736@fe3.columbus.rr.com...
>
>> I would want a camera that I can remove the batteries from the camera
>>for charging as it allows easy replacement of the batteries and allows me
>
> to
>
>>have two or more sets so I can keep shooting without breaks for
>
> recharging.
>
>> I would also worry about heat build up inside the camera with internal
>>charging. Those batteries build up a lot of heat when they are being
>>charged, especially with the better faster chargers.
>>
>>--
>>Joseph E. Meehan
>>
>>26 + 6 = 1 It's Irish Math
>>
>>
>>"C3" <user@host.com> wrote in message
>>news:3f0d2402$0$5428$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com. au...
>>
>>>For those of you with cameras that require you to take the battery out
>
> and
>
>>>put it into a charger, how much of an annoyance is this for you? I'm
>>>thinking of getting the Canon S400 because of its small size, but I'm
>>>worried that because it's a small battery, I'll have to take it out
>
> quite
>
>>>often when taking photos.
>>>
>>>This worries me a bit because it means extra wear and tear on the
>
> camera.
>
>>>What has your experience been?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Pay the MONEY.
A card reader can be had really CHEAP if you will go for a USB 1.1
version. Under $20, and if you have CF, under $10.