Are generics and ports static names?
David Jones (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote
> LRM 188.8.131.52, p. 63, line 508:
> "Each association element that associates a slice or subelement (or slice
> thereof) of an interface object must identify the formal with a locally
> static name."
> With these definitions, how is the following legal:
> U1: FOO port map(BAR(3) => BAZ);
> BAR is an object, therefore not a locally static name.
Annex B says
B.148 locally static name:
A name in which every expression is locally static
(if every discrete range that appears as part of the
name denotes a locally static range or subtype
and if no prefix within the name is either an object or
value of an access type or a function call).
BAR(3) is a locally static name because "3" is a static subrange.
It's legal as long as the rest of BAR'range is covered,
and there isn't an constant or function in scope named
"ba" for example.
-- Mike Treseler
|All times are GMT. The time now is 03:20 PM.|
Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.