Re: drop down
Thursday March 23 2006, dorayme writes to Gufus:
> From: doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au
> Well, I think he might have meant the way the diagonal rects
> overlap the pic to the left (especially on enlarging text).
> It looks terrible (messy, confusing, hard to read...) this
Okay, that image is a (water mark) and I can very well fade it right out
until it's barely readable. I always appreciate constructive criticism, I'll
try fading it out, and removing it too.
> The only thing I can add is lose the html validation logo,
> it would mean little to the punters and it is... I don't
Okay, I wasn't going to use it, remember this page is just a working example
until I come up with the finished product, then the whole web site gets this
layout, good design is always consistent, right. :)
> want to hurt your feelings here Gufus... laughable to many
Nope.. I appreciate constructive critics..
> Or put it this way, imagine selling a Russian car of 1960
> vintage (in brand new condition even) with a
> mechanical/environmental validation sticker from 1971. The
> sticker, today, would look sad as the car belched and
> hiccupped its way from the car dealership...
Very well said Sir. :)
.... CON is to PRO as CONgress is to PROgress.
|All times are GMT. The time now is 09:37 AM.|
Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.