![]() |
Re: Sockets for inter-process communication
Jeremy wrote:
> Is this terribly inefficient? What I mean is - using a network socket to > exchange objects with another app or thread on the same machine. Is there a > more efficient way to do this? Any good reading on inter-app communication > (or inter-thread communication within the same VM)? > > Thanks, > -Jeremy Someone already mentioned using PipedInputStream/PipedOutputStream for inter-thread communication. Jon Cruz also alluded to the fact that the typical TCP/IP protocol stack is smart enough to know when the source and destination are the same machine (even with different addresses) and can "short-circuit" the processing so that packets never actually get transmitted on the physical interfaces. An additional wrinkle in the *NIX environment is named pipes, accessed using AF_UNIX in the socket call. These are usually very efficient. Of course they're also are limited to inter-process communication on the same host. Always cheaper to use kernel memory, don't you know... |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 07:53 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®. Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.